Agent skill
simulation-validator
Validate simulations across three stages — run pre-flight checks on configuration files (parameter ranges, required fields, disk space), monitor runtime logs for residual growth, NaN/Inf, and adaptive dt collapse, and perform post-flight validation of results (physical bounds, mass/energy conservation, convergence). Diagnose failed simulations with probable-cause analysis and recommended fixes. Use when preparing to launch a simulation, checking whether a running job is healthy, verifying that finished results are trustworthy, or debugging a crash or blow-up, even if the user only says "my simulation crashed" or "can I trust these results."
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills/tree/main/skills/simulation-workflow/simulation-validator
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- author
- HeshamFS
- version
- 1.1.0
- eval cases
- 2
- tested with
-
[ "claude-code", "gemini-cli", "vs-code-copilot" ] - last reviewed
- 2026-03-26
- security tier
- high
- security reviewed
- YES
SKILL.md
Simulation Validator
Goal
Provide a three-stage validation protocol: pre-flight checks, runtime monitoring, and post-flight validation for materials simulations.
Requirements
- Python 3.8+
- No external dependencies (uses Python standard library only)
- Works on Linux, macOS, and Windows
Inputs to Gather
Before running validation scripts, collect from the user:
| Input | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Config file | Simulation configuration (JSON/YAML) | simulation.json |
| Log file | Runtime output log | simulation.log |
| Metrics file | Post-run metrics (JSON) | results.json |
| Required params | Parameters that must exist | dt,dx,kappa |
| Valid ranges | Parameter bounds | dt:1e-6:1e-2 |
Decision Guidance
When to Run Each Stage
Is simulation about to start?
├── YES → Run Stage 1: preflight_checker.py
│ └── BLOCK status? → Fix issues, do NOT run simulation
│ └── WARN status? → Review warnings, document if accepted
│ └── PASS status? → Proceed to run simulation
│
Is simulation running?
├── YES → Run Stage 2: runtime_monitor.py (periodically)
│ └── Alerts? → Consider stopping, check parameters
│
Has simulation finished?
├── YES → Run Stage 3: result_validator.py
│ └── Failed checks? → Do NOT use results
│ → Run failure_diagnoser.py
│ └── All passed? → Results are valid
Choosing Validation Thresholds
| Metric | Conservative | Standard | Relaxed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mass tolerance | 1e-6 | 1e-3 | 1e-2 |
| Residual growth | 2x | 10x | 100x |
| dt reduction | 10x | 100x | 1000x |
Script Outputs (JSON Fields)
| Script | Output Fields |
|---|---|
scripts/preflight_checker.py |
report.status, report.blockers, report.warnings |
scripts/runtime_monitor.py |
alerts, residual_stats, dt_stats |
scripts/result_validator.py |
checks, confidence_score, failed_checks |
scripts/failure_diagnoser.py |
probable_causes, recommended_fixes |
Three-Stage Validation Protocol
Stage 1: Pre-flight (Before Simulation)
- Run
scripts/preflight_checker.py --config simulation.json - BLOCK status: Stop immediately, fix all blocker issues
- WARN status: Review warnings, document accepted risks
- PASS status: Proceed to simulation
python3 scripts/preflight_checker.py \
--config simulation.json \
--required dt,dx,kappa \
--ranges "dt:1e-6:1e-2,dx:1e-4:1e-1" \
--min-free-gb 1.0 \
--json
Stage 2: Runtime (During Simulation)
- Run
scripts/runtime_monitor.py --log simulation.logperiodically - Configure alert thresholds based on problem type
- Stop simulation if critical alerts appear
python3 scripts/runtime_monitor.py \
--log simulation.log \
--residual-growth 10.0 \
--dt-drop 100.0 \
--json
Stage 3: Post-flight (After Simulation)
- Run
scripts/result_validator.py --metrics results.json - All checks PASS: Results are valid for analysis
- Any check FAIL: Do NOT use results, diagnose failure
python3 scripts/result_validator.py \
--metrics results.json \
--bound-min 0.0 \
--bound-max 1.0 \
--mass-tol 1e-3 \
--json
Failure Diagnosis
When validation fails:
python3 scripts/failure_diagnoser.py --log simulation.log --json
Conversational Workflow Example
User: My phase field simulation crashed after 1000 steps. Can you help me figure out why?
Agent workflow:
- First, check the log for obvious errors:
bash
python3 scripts/failure_diagnoser.py --log simulation.log --json - If diagnosis suggests numerical blow-up, check runtime stats:
bash
python3 scripts/runtime_monitor.py --log simulation.log --json - Recommend fixes based on findings:
- If residual grew rapidly → reduce time step
- If dt collapsed → check stability conditions
- If NaN detected → check initial conditions
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
Config not found |
File path invalid | Verify config path exists |
Non-numeric value |
Parameter is not a number | Fix config file format |
out of range |
Parameter outside bounds | Adjust parameter or bounds |
Output directory not writable |
Permission issue | Check directory permissions |
Insufficient disk space |
Disk nearly full | Free up space or reduce output |
Interpretation Guidance
Status Meanings
| Status | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| PASS | All checks passed | Proceed with confidence |
| WARN | Non-critical issues found | Review and document |
| BLOCK | Critical issues found | Must fix before proceeding |
Confidence Score Interpretation
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 1.0 | All validation checks passed |
| 0.75+ | Most checks passed, minor issues |
| 0.5-0.75 | Significant issues, review carefully |
| < 0.5 | Major problems, do not trust results |
Common Failure Patterns
| Pattern in Log | Likely Cause | Recommended Fix |
|---|---|---|
| NaN, Inf, overflow | Numerical instability | Reduce dt, increase damping |
| max iterations, did not converge | Solver failure | Tune preconditioner, tolerances |
| out of memory | Memory exhaustion | Reduce mesh, enable out-of-core |
| dt reduced | Adaptive stepping triggered | May be okay if controlled |
Security
Input Validation
- Config file paths are validated for existence before parsing; non-existent paths produce clear errors
--requiredparameter names are validated against a safe-character allowlist--rangesentries are parsed asname:min:maxwith finite numeric bounds enforced--min-free-gbis validated as a finite positive number--residual-growthand--dt-dropthresholds are validated as finite positive numbers--bound-min,--bound-max, and--mass-tolare validated as finite numbers withbound-max > bound-min
File Access
preflight_checker.pyreads a single user-specified config file (JSON/YAML) and checks disk space on the output directoryruntime_monitor.pyreads a single log file specified by--log; log files are size-limited (500 MB max) before parsingresult_validator.pyreads a single metrics file (JSON) specified by--metricsfailure_diagnoser.pyreads a single log file specified by--log- No scripts write to the filesystem; all output goes to stdout
Tool Restrictions
- Read: Used to inspect script source, references, config files, and simulation logs
- Bash: Used to execute the four Python validation scripts (
preflight_checker.py,runtime_monitor.py,result_validator.py,failure_diagnoser.py) with explicit argument lists - Write: Used to save validation reports; writes are scoped to the user's working directory
- Grep/Glob: Used to locate log files, config files, and search references
Safety Measures
- No
eval(),exec(), or dynamic code generation - All subprocess calls use explicit argument lists (no
shell=True) - Log parsing uses pre-compiled regex patterns; user-supplied patterns are not accepted (patterns are hardcoded)
- Phase names and diagnostic strings extracted from logs are sanitized (truncated, control characters stripped) before inclusion in output
Limitations
- Not a real-time monitor: Scripts analyze logs after-the-fact
- Regex-based: Log parsing depends on pattern matching; may miss unusual formats
- No automatic fixes: Scripts diagnose but don't modify simulations
References
references/validation_protocol.md- Detailed checklist and criteriareferences/log_patterns.md- Common failure signatures and regex patterns
Version History
- v1.1.0 (2024-12-24): Enhanced documentation, decision guidance, Windows compatibility
- v1.0.0: Initial release with 4 validation scripts
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
post-processing
Extract, analyze, and summarize simulation output data — pull spatial fields at specific timesteps, compute time-series trends and detect steady state, extract line profiles through the domain, generate statistical summaries and distributions, calculate derived quantities (gradients, fluxes, volume fractions, interface area), compare results against analytical solutions or experimental data, and produce automated analysis reports. Use when interpreting finished simulation results, checking mass or energy conservation, comparing two runs or meshes, extracting interface profiles from phase-field output, or preparing publication-quality analysis, even if the user only says "what do my results look like" or "did my simulation reach steady state."
performance-profiling
Identify computational bottlenecks, analyze parallel scaling, estimate memory requirements, and generate optimization recommendations for materials simulations — parse timing logs to find dominant phases (solver, assembly, I/O), evaluate strong and weak scaling efficiency, profile memory from mesh and field parameters, and detect bottlenecks with actionable fix suggestions. Use when a simulation is running slower than expected, investigating MPI scaling efficiency, planning HPC resource allocation, deciding whether to tune the preconditioner or reduce I/O frequency, or estimating if a problem fits in available RAM, even if the user only says "my simulation is too slow" or "how many nodes do I need."
parameter-optimization
Explore and optimize simulation parameters via design of experiments (DOE), sensitivity analysis, and optimizer selection — generate Latin Hypercube, quasi-random, or factorial sample plans, rank parameter influence with sensitivity scores, recommend Bayesian optimization, CMA-ES, or gradient- based methods based on dimension and budget, and fit surrogate models for expensive evaluations. Use when calibrating material properties against experimental data, planning a parameter sweep, performing uncertainty quantification, or choosing an optimization strategy for a simulation with a limited evaluation budget, even if the user only says "which parameters matter most" or "how do I calibrate my model."
simulation-orchestrator
Orchestrate multi-simulation campaigns — generate parameter sweep configurations (grid, linspace, or Latin Hypercube sampling), initialize and track batch job campaigns, monitor job completion status, and aggregate results with summary statistics across all runs. Use when running a parameter study across dt, kappa, or other simulation inputs, managing dozens or hundreds of simulation configurations, combining outputs from completed batch runs to find the best result, or automating the generate-run-collect workflow for systematic studies, even if the user only says "I need to try many parameter combinations" or "how do I organize a sweep."
ontology-explorer
Parse, navigate, and query materials science ontology structures — browse class hierarchies, inspect individual classes and their properties, look up object and data property definitions with domain/range, search for ontology terms by keyword, and parse or summarize raw OWL/XML files. Supports the OCDO ecosystem (CMSO, ASMO, CDCO, PODO, PLDO, LDO). Use when exploring what classes or properties an ontology provides, finding the right CMSO term for a crystal structure or simulation concept, understanding parent-child class relationships, or onboarding to an unfamiliar materials ontology, even if the user only says "what ontology terms describe my FCC copper simulation" or "show me the CMSO class hierarchy."
ontology-mapper
Map materials science terms, crystal structures, and sample descriptions to standardized ontology classes and properties — resolve natural-language concepts to ontology entries with confidence scores, translate Bravais lattice types, space groups, and lattice constants into ontology-compliant annotations, and produce full sample metadata from structured descriptions. Supports any ontology in ontology_registry.json (CMSO, ASMO, etc.). Use when annotating simulation inputs with FAIR metadata, translating "BCC iron" or "FCC copper" into formal ontology terms, preparing machine- readable sample descriptions, or bridging between lab vocabulary and ontology vocabulary, even if the user only says "what CMSO terms describe my material" or "annotate this sample for me."
Didn't find tool you were looking for?