Agent skill

simulation-orchestrator

Orchestrate multi-simulation campaigns — generate parameter sweep configurations (grid, linspace, or Latin Hypercube sampling), initialize and track batch job campaigns, monitor job completion status, and aggregate results with summary statistics across all runs. Use when running a parameter study across dt, kappa, or other simulation inputs, managing dozens or hundreds of simulation configurations, combining outputs from completed batch runs to find the best result, or automating the generate-run-collect workflow for systematic studies, even if the user only says "I need to try many parameter combinations" or "how do I organize a sweep."

Stars 29
Forks 2

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills/tree/main/skills/simulation-workflow/simulation-orchestrator

Metadata

Additional technical details for this skill

author
HeshamFS
version
1.1.0
eval cases
2
tested with
[
    "claude-code",
    "gemini-cli",
    "vs-code-copilot"
]
last reviewed
2026-03-26
security tier
medium
security reviewed
YES

SKILL.md

Simulation Orchestrator

Goal

Provide tools to manage multi-simulation campaigns: generate parameter sweeps, track job execution status, and aggregate results from completed runs.

Requirements

  • Python 3.10+
  • No external dependencies (uses Python standard library only)
  • Works on Linux, macOS, and Windows

Inputs to Gather

Before running orchestration scripts, collect from the user:

Input Description Example
Base config Template simulation configuration base_config.json
Parameter ranges Parameters to sweep with bounds dt:[1e-4,1e-2],kappa:[0.1,1.0]
Sweep method How to sample parameter space grid, lhs, linspace
Output directory Where to store campaign files ./campaign_001
Simulation command Command to run each simulation python sim.py --config {config}

Decision Guidance

Choosing a Sweep Method

Need every combination (full factorial)?
├── YES → Use grid (warning: exponential growth with parameters)
└── NO → Is space-filling coverage needed?
    ├── YES → Use lhs (Latin Hypercube Sampling)
    └── NO → Use linspace for uniform sampling per parameter
Method Best For Sample Count
grid Low dimensions (1-3), need exact corners n^d (exponential)
linspace 1D sweeps, uniform spacing n per parameter
lhs High dimensions, space-filling user-specified budget

Campaign Size Guidelines

Parameters Grid Points Each Total Runs Recommendation
1 10 10 Grid is fine
2 10 100 Grid acceptable
3 10 1,000 Consider LHS
4+ 10 10,000+ Use LHS or DOE

Script Outputs (JSON Fields)

Script Output Fields
scripts/sweep_generator.py configs, parameter_space, sweep_method, total_runs
scripts/campaign_manager.py campaign_id, status, jobs, progress
scripts/job_tracker.py job_id, status, start_time, end_time, exit_code
scripts/result_aggregator.py summary, statistics, best_run, failed_runs

Workflow

Step 1: Generate Parameter Sweep

Create configurations for all parameter combinations:

bash
python3 scripts/sweep_generator.py \
    --base-config base_config.json \
    --params "dt:1e-4:1e-2:5,kappa:0.1:1.0:3" \
    --method linspace \
    --output-dir ./campaign_001 \
    --json

Step 2: Initialize Campaign

Create campaign tracking structure:

bash
python3 scripts/campaign_manager.py \
    --action init \
    --config-dir ./campaign_001 \
    --command "python sim.py --config {config}" \
    --json

Step 3: Track Job Status

Monitor running jobs:

bash
python3 scripts/job_tracker.py \
    --campaign-dir ./campaign_001 \
    --update \
    --json

Step 4: Aggregate Results

Combine results from completed runs:

bash
python3 scripts/result_aggregator.py \
    --campaign-dir ./campaign_001 \
    --metric objective_value \
    --json

CLI Examples

bash
# Generate 5x3=15 runs varying dt (5 values) and kappa (3 values)
python3 scripts/sweep_generator.py \
    --base-config sim.json \
    --params "dt:1e-4:1e-2:5,kappa:0.1:1.0:3" \
    --method linspace \
    --output-dir ./sweep_001 \
    --json

# Generate LHS samples for 4 parameters with budget of 20 runs
python3 scripts/sweep_generator.py \
    --base-config sim.json \
    --params "dt:1e-4:1e-2,kappa:0.1:1.0,M:1e-6:1e-4,W:0.5:2.0" \
    --method lhs \
    --samples 20 \
    --output-dir ./lhs_001 \
    --json

# Check campaign status
python3 scripts/campaign_manager.py \
    --action status \
    --config-dir ./sweep_001 \
    --json

# Get summary statistics from completed runs
python3 scripts/result_aggregator.py \
    --campaign-dir ./sweep_001 \
    --metric final_energy \
    --json

Conversational Workflow Example

User: I want to run a parameter sweep on dt and kappa for my phase-field simulation. I want to try 5 values of dt between 1e-4 and 1e-2, and 4 values of kappa between 0.1 and 1.0.

Agent workflow:

  1. Calculate total runs: 5 x 4 = 20 runs
  2. Generate sweep configurations:
    bash
    python3 scripts/sweep_generator.py \
        --base-config simulation.json \
        --params "dt:1e-4:1e-2:5,kappa:0.1:1.0:4" \
        --method linspace \
        --output-dir ./dt_kappa_sweep \
        --json
    
  3. Initialize campaign:
    bash
    python3 scripts/campaign_manager.py \
        --action init \
        --config-dir ./dt_kappa_sweep \
        --command "python phase_field.py --config {config}" \
        --json
    
  4. After user runs simulations, aggregate results:
    bash
    python3 scripts/result_aggregator.py \
        --campaign-dir ./dt_kappa_sweep \
        --metric interface_width \
        --json
    

Error Handling

Error Cause Resolution
Base config not found Invalid file path Verify base config file exists
Invalid parameter format Malformed param string Use format name:min:max:count or name:min:max
Output directory exists Would overwrite Use --force or choose new directory
No completed jobs No results to aggregate Wait for jobs to complete or check for failures
Metric not found Result files missing field Verify metric name in result JSON

Integration with Other Skills

The simulation-orchestrator works with other simulation-workflow skills:

parameter-optimization          simulation-orchestrator
        │                              │
        │ DOE samples ────────────────>│ Generate configs
        │                              │
        │                              │ Run simulations
        │                              │
        │<──────────────────────────── │ Aggregate results
        │                              │
        │ Sensitivity analysis         │
        │ Optimizer selection          │

Typical Combined Workflow

  1. Use parameter-optimization/doe_generator.py to get sample points
  2. Use simulation-orchestrator/sweep_generator.py to create configs
  3. Run simulations (user's responsibility)
  4. Use simulation-orchestrator/result_aggregator.py to collect results
  5. Use parameter-optimization/sensitivity_summary.py to analyze

Security

Input Validation

  • Metric names are validated against [a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_.]* to prevent traversal or injection via crafted keys
  • campaign_manager.py validates command templates to reject shell chaining operators (;, |, &, backticks, $)
  • --params format strings are parsed and validated (name:min:max:count with finite numeric bounds and positive integer counts)
  • --method is validated against a fixed allowlist (grid, linspace, lhs)
  • --samples is validated as a positive integer with an upper bound
  • --action is validated against a fixed allowlist (init, status)

File Access

  • sweep_generator.py reads a single base config file (JSON) specified by --base-config and writes generated configs to --output-dir
  • result_aggregator.py enforces a 10 MB file-size limit per result file, maximum JSON nesting depth, and strict numeric type checking (rejects bool, NaN, Inf)
  • All string values from result files are sanitized (truncated, control characters stripped) before surfacing them
  • Config paths interpolated into shell commands are validated against a safe-character allowlist and escaped with shlex.quote()

Tool Restrictions

  • Read: Used to inspect script source, references, base configs, and campaign status files
  • Write: Used to save generated sweep configs, campaign manifests, and aggregated results; writes are scoped to the user's working directory
  • Grep/Glob: Used to locate campaign files, result files, and search references
  • The skill's allowed-tools excludes Bash to prevent the agent from executing arbitrary commands when processing untrusted simulation outputs

Safety Measures

  • No eval(), exec(), or dynamic code generation
  • All subprocess calls use explicit argument lists (no shell=True)
  • Reduced tool surface (no Bash) limits the agent to read/write operations only
  • Command templates are validated but never executed by the skill itself; execution is the user's responsibility

Limitations

  • Not a job scheduler: Does not submit jobs to SLURM/PBS; generates configs and tracks status
  • No parallel execution: User must run simulations externally (can use GNU parallel, SLURM, etc.)
  • File-based tracking: Status tracked via files; no database or real-time monitoring
  • Local filesystem: Assumes all files accessible from local machine

References

  • references/campaign_patterns.md - Common campaign structures
  • references/sweep_strategies.md - Parameter sweep design guidance
  • references/aggregation_methods.md - Result aggregation techniques

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2024-12-24): Initial release with sweep, campaign, tracking, and aggregation

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills

post-processing

Extract, analyze, and summarize simulation output data — pull spatial fields at specific timesteps, compute time-series trends and detect steady state, extract line profiles through the domain, generate statistical summaries and distributions, calculate derived quantities (gradients, fluxes, volume fractions, interface area), compare results against analytical solutions or experimental data, and produce automated analysis reports. Use when interpreting finished simulation results, checking mass or energy conservation, comparing two runs or meshes, extracting interface profiles from phase-field output, or preparing publication-quality analysis, even if the user only says "what do my results look like" or "did my simulation reach steady state."

29 2
Explore
HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills

performance-profiling

Identify computational bottlenecks, analyze parallel scaling, estimate memory requirements, and generate optimization recommendations for materials simulations — parse timing logs to find dominant phases (solver, assembly, I/O), evaluate strong and weak scaling efficiency, profile memory from mesh and field parameters, and detect bottlenecks with actionable fix suggestions. Use when a simulation is running slower than expected, investigating MPI scaling efficiency, planning HPC resource allocation, deciding whether to tune the preconditioner or reduce I/O frequency, or estimating if a problem fits in available RAM, even if the user only says "my simulation is too slow" or "how many nodes do I need."

29 2
Explore
HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills

parameter-optimization

Explore and optimize simulation parameters via design of experiments (DOE), sensitivity analysis, and optimizer selection — generate Latin Hypercube, quasi-random, or factorial sample plans, rank parameter influence with sensitivity scores, recommend Bayesian optimization, CMA-ES, or gradient- based methods based on dimension and budget, and fit surrogate models for expensive evaluations. Use when calibrating material properties against experimental data, planning a parameter sweep, performing uncertainty quantification, or choosing an optimization strategy for a simulation with a limited evaluation budget, even if the user only says "which parameters matter most" or "how do I calibrate my model."

29 2
Explore
HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills

simulation-validator

Validate simulations across three stages — run pre-flight checks on configuration files (parameter ranges, required fields, disk space), monitor runtime logs for residual growth, NaN/Inf, and adaptive dt collapse, and perform post-flight validation of results (physical bounds, mass/energy conservation, convergence). Diagnose failed simulations with probable-cause analysis and recommended fixes. Use when preparing to launch a simulation, checking whether a running job is healthy, verifying that finished results are trustworthy, or debugging a crash or blow-up, even if the user only says "my simulation crashed" or "can I trust these results."

29 2
Explore
HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills

ontology-explorer

Parse, navigate, and query materials science ontology structures — browse class hierarchies, inspect individual classes and their properties, look up object and data property definitions with domain/range, search for ontology terms by keyword, and parse or summarize raw OWL/XML files. Supports the OCDO ecosystem (CMSO, ASMO, CDCO, PODO, PLDO, LDO). Use when exploring what classes or properties an ontology provides, finding the right CMSO term for a crystal structure or simulation concept, understanding parent-child class relationships, or onboarding to an unfamiliar materials ontology, even if the user only says "what ontology terms describe my FCC copper simulation" or "show me the CMSO class hierarchy."

29 2
Explore
HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills

ontology-mapper

Map materials science terms, crystal structures, and sample descriptions to standardized ontology classes and properties — resolve natural-language concepts to ontology entries with confidence scores, translate Bravais lattice types, space groups, and lattice constants into ontology-compliant annotations, and produce full sample metadata from structured descriptions. Supports any ontology in ontology_registry.json (CMSO, ASMO, etc.). Use when annotating simulation inputs with FAIR metadata, translating "BCC iron" or "FCC copper" into formal ontology terms, preparing machine- readable sample descriptions, or bridging between lab vocabulary and ontology vocabulary, even if the user only says "what CMSO terms describe my material" or "annotate this sample for me."

29 2
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results