Agent skill
writing-mstest-tests
Best practices for writing MSTest 3.x/4.x unit tests. Use when the user needs to write, improve, fix, or review MSTest tests, including modern assertions, data-driven tests, test lifecycle, and common anti-patterns. Also use when fixing test issues like swapped Assert.AreEqual arguments, incorrect assertion usage, or modernizing legacy test code. Covers MSTest.Sdk, sealed classes, Assert.Throws, DynamicData with ValueTuples, TestContext, and conditional execution.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skills/tree/main/external-sources/upstreams/dotnet-skills/dotnet-test/skills/writing-mstest-tests
SKILL.md
Writing MSTest Tests
Help users write effective, modern unit tests with MSTest 3.x/4.x using current APIs and best practices.
When to Use
- User wants to write new MSTest unit tests
- User wants to improve or modernize existing MSTest tests
- User asks about MSTest assertion APIs, data-driven patterns, or test lifecycle
- User needs to review MSTest test code for anti-patterns
When Not to Use
- User needs to run or execute tests (use the
run-testsskill) - User needs to upgrade from MSTest v1/v2 to v3 (use
migrate-mstest-v1v2-to-v3) - User needs to upgrade from MSTest v3 to v4 (use
migrate-mstest-v3-to-v4) - User needs CI/CD pipeline configuration
- User is using xUnit, NUnit, or TUnit (not MSTest)
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code under test | No | The production code to be tested |
| Existing test code | No | Current tests to review or improve |
| Test scenario description | No | What behavior the user wants to test |
Workflow
Step 1: Determine project setup
Check the test project for MSTest version and configuration:
- If using
MSTest.Sdk(<Sdk Name="MSTest.Sdk">): modern setup, all features available - If using
MSTestmetapackage: modern setup (MSTest 3.x+) - If using
MSTest.TestFramework+MSTest.TestAdapter: check version for feature availability
Recommend MSTest.Sdk or the MSTest metapackage for new projects:
<!-- Option 1: MSTest SDK (simplest, recommended for new projects) -->
<Project Sdk="MSTest.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
When using MSTest.Sdk, put the version in global.json instead of the project file so all test projects get bumped together:
{
"msbuild-sdks": {
"MSTest.Sdk": "3.8.2"
}
}
<!-- Option 2: MSTest metapackage -->
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="MSTest" Version="3.8.2" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
Step 2: Write test classes following conventions
Apply these structural conventions:
- Seal test classes with
sealedfor performance and design clarity - Use
[TestClass]on the class and[TestMethod]on test methods - Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
- Name tests using
MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior - Use separate test projects with naming convention
[ProjectName].Tests
[TestClass]
public sealed class OrderServiceTests
{
[TestMethod]
public void CalculateTotal_WithDiscount_ReturnsReducedPrice()
{
// Arrange
var service = new OrderService();
var order = new Order { Price = 100m, DiscountPercent = 10 };
// Act
var total = service.CalculateTotal(order);
// Assert
Assert.AreEqual(90m, total);
}
}
Step 3: Use modern assertion APIs
Use the correct assertion for each scenario. Prefer Assert class methods over StringAssert or CollectionAssert where both exist.
Equality and null checks
Assert.AreEqual(expected, actual); // Value equality
Assert.AreSame(expected, actual); // Reference equality
Assert.IsNull(value);
Assert.IsNotNull(value);
Exception testing -- use Assert.Throws instead of [ExpectedException]
// Synchronous
var ex = Assert.ThrowsExactly<ArgumentNullException>(() => service.Process(null));
Assert.AreEqual("input", ex.ParamName);
// Async
var ex = await Assert.ThrowsExactlyAsync<InvalidOperationException>(
async () => await service.ProcessAsync(null));
Assert.Throws<T>matchesTor any derived typeAssert.ThrowsExactly<T>matches only the exact typeT
Collection assertions
Assert.Contains(expectedItem, collection);
Assert.DoesNotContain(unexpectedItem, collection);
var single = Assert.ContainsSingle(collection); // Returns the single element
Assert.HasCount(3, collection);
Assert.IsEmpty(collection);
Assert.IsNotEmpty(collection);
Replace generic Assert.IsTrue with specialized assertions -- they give better failure messages:
| Instead of | Use |
|---|---|
Assert.IsTrue(list.Count > 0) |
Assert.IsNotEmpty(list) |
Assert.IsTrue(list.Count() == 3) |
Assert.HasCount(3, list) |
Assert.IsTrue(x != null) |
Assert.IsNotNull(x) |
list.Single(predicate) + Assert.IsNotNull |
Assert.ContainsSingle(list) |
Assert.IsTrue(list.Contains(item)) |
Assert.Contains(item, list) |
String assertions
Assert.Contains("expected", actualString);
Assert.StartsWith("prefix", actualString);
Assert.EndsWith("suffix", actualString);
Assert.MatchesRegex(@"\d{3}-\d{4}", phoneNumber);
Type assertions
// MSTest 3.x -- out parameter
Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyHandler>(result, out var typed);
typed.Handle();
// MSTest 4.x -- returns directly
var typed = Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyHandler>(result);
Comparison assertions
Assert.IsGreaterThan(lowerBound, actual);
Assert.IsLessThan(upperBound, actual);
Assert.IsInRange(actual, low, high);
Step 4: Use data-driven tests for multiple inputs
DataRow for inline values
[TestMethod]
[DataRow(1, 2, 3)]
[DataRow(0, 0, 0, DisplayName = "Zeros")]
[DataRow(-1, 1, 0)]
public void Add_ReturnsExpectedSum(int a, int b, int expected)
{
Assert.AreEqual(expected, Calculator.Add(a, b));
}
DynamicData with ValueTuples (preferred for complex data)
Prefer ValueTuple return types over IEnumerable<object[]> for type safety:
[TestMethod]
[DynamicData(nameof(DiscountTestData))]
public void ApplyDiscount_ReturnsExpectedPrice(decimal price, int percent, decimal expected)
{
var result = PriceCalculator.ApplyDiscount(price, percent);
Assert.AreEqual(expected, result);
}
// ValueTuple -- preferred (MSTest 3.7+)
public static IEnumerable<(decimal price, int percent, decimal expected)> DiscountTestData =>
[
(100m, 10, 90m),
(200m, 25, 150m),
(50m, 0, 50m),
];
When you need metadata per test case, use TestDataRow<T>:
public static IEnumerable<TestDataRow<(decimal price, int percent, decimal expected)>> DiscountTestDataWithMetadata =>
[
new((100m, 10, 90m)) { DisplayName = "10% discount" },
new((200m, 25, 150m)) { DisplayName = "25% discount" },
new((50m, 0, 50m)) { DisplayName = "No discount" },
];
Step 5: Handle test lifecycle correctly
- Always initialize in the constructor -- this enables
readonlyfields and works correctly with nullability analyzers (fields are guaranteed non-null after construction) - Use
[TestInitialize]only for async initialization, combined with the constructor for sync parts - Use
[TestCleanup]for cleanup that must run even on failure - Inject
TestContextvia constructor (MSTest 3.6+)
[TestClass]
public sealed class RepositoryTests
{
private readonly TestContext _testContext;
private readonly FakeDatabase _db; // readonly -- guaranteed by constructor
public RepositoryTests(TestContext testContext)
{
_testContext = testContext;
_db = new FakeDatabase(); // sync init in ctor
}
[TestInitialize]
public async Task InitAsync()
{
// Use TestInitialize ONLY for async setup
await _db.SeedAsync();
}
[TestCleanup]
public void Cleanup() => _db.Reset();
}
Execution order
[AssemblyInitialize]-- once per assembly[ClassInitialize]-- once per class- Per test:
- With
TestContextproperty injection: Constructor -> setTestContextproperty ->[TestInitialize] - With constructor injection of
TestContext: Constructor (receivesTestContext) ->[TestInitialize]
- With
- Test method
[TestCleanup]->DisposeAsync->Dispose-- per test[ClassCleanup]-- once per class[AssemblyCleanup]-- once per assembly
Step 6: Apply cancellation and timeout patterns
Always use TestContext.CancellationToken with [Timeout]:
[TestMethod]
[Timeout(5000)]
public async Task FetchData_ReturnsWithinTimeout()
{
var result = await _client.GetDataAsync(_testContext.CancellationToken);
Assert.IsNotNull(result);
}
Step 7: Use advanced features where appropriate
Retry flaky tests (MSTest 3.9+)
Use only for genuinely flaky external dependencies (network, file system), not to paper over race conditions or shared state issues.
[TestMethod]
[Retry(3)]
public void ExternalService_EventuallyResponds() { }
Conditional execution (MSTest 3.10+)
[TestMethod]
[OSCondition(OperatingSystems.Windows)]
public void WindowsRegistry_ReadsValue() { }
[TestMethod]
[CICondition(ConditionMode.Exclude)]
public void LocalOnly_InteractiveTest() { }
Parallelization
[assembly: Parallelize(Workers = 4, Scope = ExecutionScope.MethodLevel)]
[TestClass]
[DoNotParallelize] // Opt out specific classes
public sealed class DatabaseIntegrationTests { }
Validation
- Test classes are
sealed - Test methods follow
MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehaviornaming -
Assert.ThrowsExactly<T>used instead of[ExpectedException] - Specialized assertions used instead of
Assert.IsTrue(e.g.,Assert.IsNotNull,Assert.AreEqual) - DynamicData uses ValueTuple return types instead of
IEnumerable<object[]> - Sync initialization done in the constructor, not
[TestInitialize] -
TestContext.CancellationTokenpassed to async calls in tests with[Timeout] - Project builds with zero errors and all tests pass
Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Solution |
|---|---|
Assert.AreEqual(actual, expected) -- swapped arguments |
Always put expected first: Assert.AreEqual(expected, actual). Failure messages show "Expected: X, Actual: Y" so wrong order makes messages confusing |
[ExpectedException] -- obsolete, cannot assert message |
Use Assert.Throws<T> or Assert.ThrowsExactly<T> |
items.Single() -- unclear exception on failure |
Use Assert.ContainsSingle(items) for better failure messages |
Hard cast (MyType)result -- unclear exception |
Use Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyType>(result) |
IEnumerable<object[]> for DynamicData |
Use IEnumerable<(T1, T2, ...)> ValueTuples for type safety |
Sync setup in [TestInitialize] |
Initialize in the constructor instead -- enables readonly fields and satisfies nullability analyzers |
CancellationToken.None in async tests |
Use TestContext.CancellationToken for cooperative timeout |
public TestContext? TestContext { get; set; } |
Drop the ? -- MSTest suppresses CS8618 for this property |
TestContext TestContext { get; set; } = null! |
Remove = null! -- unnecessary, MSTest handles assignment |
| Non-sealed test classes | Seal test classes by default for performance |
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
dotnet-project-setup
Create or reorganize .NET solutions with clean project boundaries, repeatable SDK settings, and a maintainable baseline for libraries, apps, tests, CI, and local development.
csharp-scripts
Run single-file C# programs as scripts (file-based apps) for quick experimentation, prototyping, and concept testing. Use when the user wants to write and execute a small C# program without creating a full project.
dotnet-pinvoke
Correctly call native (C/C++) libraries from .NET using P/Invoke and LibraryImport. Covers function signatures, string marshalling, memory lifetime, SafeHandle, and cross-platform patterns. USE FOR: writing new P/Invoke or LibraryImport declarations, reviewing or debugging existing native interop code, wrapping a C or C++ library for use in .NET, diagnosing crashes, memory leaks, or corruption at the managed/native boundary. DO NOT USE FOR: COM interop, C++/CLI mixed-mode assemblies, or pure managed code with no native dependencies.
nuget-trusted-publishing
Set up NuGet trusted publishing (OIDC) on a GitHub Actions repo — replaces long-lived API keys with short-lived tokens. USE FOR: trusted publishing, NuGet OIDC, keyless NuGet publish, migrate from NuGet API key, NuGet/login, secure NuGet publishing. DO NOT USE FOR: publishing to private feeds or Azure Artifacts (OIDC is nuget.org only). INVOKES: shell (powershell or bash), edit, create, ask_user for guided repo setup.
dotnet-legacy-aspnet
Maintain classic ASP.NET applications on .NET Framework, including Web Forms, older MVC, and legacy hosting patterns, while planning realistic modernization boundaries.
dotnet-code-review
Review .NET changes for bugs, regressions, architectural drift, missing tests, incorrect async or disposal behavior, and platform-specific pitfalls before you approve or merge them.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?