Agent skill
ux-researcher-designer
UX research and design toolkit for Senior UX Designer/Researcher including data-driven persona generation, journey mapping, usability testing frameworks, and research synthesis. Use for user research, persona creation, journey mapping, and design validation.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/product-team/ux-researcher-designer
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- tags
-
ux-research usability-testing user-interviews personas
- author
- borghei
- domain
- ux-research
- updated
- 1774915200
- version
- 1.0.0
- category
- product
SKILL.md
UX Researcher & Designer
Generate user personas from research data, create journey maps, plan usability tests, and synthesize research findings into actionable design recommendations.
Table of Contents
- Trigger Terms
- Workflows
- Workflow 1: Generate User Persona
- Workflow 2: Create Journey Map
- Workflow 3: Plan Usability Test
- Workflow 4: Synthesize Research
- Tool Reference
- Quick Reference Tables
- Knowledge Base
Trigger Terms
Use this skill when you need to:
- "create user persona"
- "generate persona from data"
- "build customer journey map"
- "map user journey"
- "plan usability test"
- "design usability study"
- "analyze user research"
- "synthesize interview findings"
- "identify user pain points"
- "define user archetypes"
- "calculate research sample size"
- "create empathy map"
- "identify user needs"
Workflows
Workflow 1: Generate User Persona
Situation: You have user data (analytics, surveys, interviews) and need to create a research-backed persona.
Steps:
-
Prepare user data
Required format (JSON):
json[ { "user_id": "user_1", "age": 32, "usage_frequency": "daily", "features_used": ["dashboard", "reports", "export"], "primary_device": "desktop", "usage_context": "work", "tech_proficiency": 7, "pain_points": ["slow loading", "confusing UI"] } ] -
Run persona generator
bash# Human-readable output python scripts/persona_generator.py # JSON output for integration python scripts/persona_generator.py json -
Review generated components
Component What to Check Archetype Does it match the data patterns? Demographics Are they derived from actual data? Goals Are they specific and actionable? Frustrations Do they include frequency counts? Design implications Can designers act on these? -
Validate persona
- Show to 3-5 real users: "Does this sound like you?"
- Cross-check with support tickets
- Verify against analytics data
-
Reference: See
references/persona-methodology.mdfor validity criteria
Workflow 2: Create Journey Map
Situation: You need to visualize the end-to-end user experience for a specific goal.
Steps:
-
Define scope
Element Description Persona Which user type Goal What they're trying to achieve Start Trigger that begins journey End Success criteria Timeframe Hours/days/weeks -
Gather journey data
Sources:
- User interviews (ask "walk me through...")
- Session recordings
- Analytics (funnel, drop-offs)
- Support tickets
-
Map the stages
Typical B2B SaaS stages:
Awareness → Evaluation → Onboarding → Adoption → Advocacy -
Fill in layers for each stage
Stage: [Name] ├── Actions: What does user do? ├── Touchpoints: Where do they interact? ├── Emotions: How do they feel? (1-5) ├── Pain Points: What frustrates them? └── Opportunities: Where can we improve? -
Identify opportunities
Priority Score = Frequency × Severity × Solvability
-
Reference: See
references/journey-mapping-guide.mdfor templates
Workflow 3: Plan Usability Test
Situation: You need to validate a design with real users.
Steps:
-
Define research questions
Transform vague goals into testable questions:
Vague Testable "Is it easy to use?" "Can users complete checkout in <3 min?" "Do users like it?" "Will users choose Design A or B?" "Does it make sense?" "Can users find settings without hints?" -
Select method
Method Participants Duration Best For Moderated remote 5-8 45-60 min Deep insights Unmoderated remote 10-20 15-20 min Quick validation Guerrilla 3-5 5-10 min Rapid feedback -
Design tasks
Good task format:
SCENARIO: "Imagine you're planning a trip to Paris..." GOAL: "Book a hotel for 3 nights in your budget." SUCCESS: "You see the confirmation page."Task progression: Warm-up → Core → Secondary → Edge case → Free exploration
-
Define success metrics
Metric Target Completion rate >80% Time on task <2× expected Error rate <15% Satisfaction >4/5 -
Prepare moderator guide
- Think-aloud instructions
- Non-leading prompts
- Post-task questions
-
Reference: See
references/usability-testing-frameworks.mdfor full guide
Workflow 4: Synthesize Research
Situation: You have raw research data (interviews, surveys, observations) and need actionable insights.
Steps:
-
Code the data
Tag each data point:
[GOAL]- What they want to achieve[PAIN]- What frustrates them[BEHAVIOR]- What they actually do[CONTEXT]- When/where they use product[QUOTE]- Direct user words
-
Cluster similar patterns
User A: Uses daily, advanced features, shortcuts User B: Uses daily, complex workflows, automation User C: Uses weekly, basic needs, occasional Cluster 1: A, B (Power Users) Cluster 2: C (Casual User) -
Calculate segment sizes
Cluster Users % Viability Power Users 18 36% Primary persona Business Users 15 30% Primary persona Casual Users 12 24% Secondary persona -
Extract key findings
For each theme:
- Finding statement
- Supporting evidence (quotes, data)
- Frequency (X/Y participants)
- Business impact
- Recommendation
-
Prioritize opportunities
Factor Score 1-5 Frequency How often does this occur? Severity How much does it hurt? Breadth How many users affected? Solvability Can we fix this? -
Reference: See
references/persona-methodology.mdfor analysis framework
Tool Reference
persona_generator.py
Generates data-driven personas from user research data.
| Argument | Values | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| format | (none), json | (none) | Output format |
Sample Output:
============================================================
PERSONA: Alex the Power User
============================================================
📝 A daily user who primarily uses the product for work purposes
Archetype: Power User
Quote: "I need tools that can keep up with my workflow"
👤 Demographics:
• Age Range: 25-34
• Location Type: Urban
• Tech Proficiency: Advanced
🎯 Goals & Needs:
• Complete tasks efficiently
• Automate workflows
• Access advanced features
😤 Frustrations:
• Slow loading times (14/20 users)
• No keyboard shortcuts
• Limited API access
💡 Design Implications:
→ Optimize for speed and efficiency
→ Provide keyboard shortcuts and power features
→ Expose API and automation capabilities
📈 Data: Based on 45 users
Confidence: High
Archetypes Generated:
| Archetype | Signals | Design Focus |
|---|---|---|
| power_user | Daily use, 10+ features | Efficiency, customization |
| casual_user | Weekly use, 3-5 features | Simplicity, guidance |
| business_user | Work context, team use | Collaboration, reporting |
| mobile_first | Mobile primary | Touch, offline, speed |
Output Components:
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| demographics | Age range, location, occupation, tech level |
| psychographics | Motivations, values, attitudes, lifestyle |
| behaviors | Usage patterns, feature preferences |
| needs_and_goals | Primary, secondary, functional, emotional |
| frustrations | Pain points with evidence |
| scenarios | Contextual usage stories |
| design_implications | Actionable recommendations |
| data_points | Sample size, confidence level |
Quick Reference Tables
Research Method Selection
| Question Type | Best Method | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|
| "What do users do?" | Analytics, observation | 100+ events |
| "Why do they do it?" | Interviews | 8-15 users |
| "How well can they do it?" | Usability test | 5-8 users |
| "What do they prefer?" | Survey, A/B test | 50+ users |
| "What do they feel?" | Diary study, interviews | 10-15 users |
Persona Confidence Levels
| Sample Size | Confidence | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| 5-10 users | Low | Exploratory |
| 11-30 users | Medium | Directional |
| 31+ users | High | Production |
Usability Issue Severity
| Severity | Definition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 4 - Critical | Prevents task completion | Fix immediately |
| 3 - Major | Significant difficulty | Fix before release |
| 2 - Minor | Causes hesitation | Fix when possible |
| 1 - Cosmetic | Noticed but not problematic | Low priority |
Interview Question Types
| Type | Example | Use For |
|---|---|---|
| Context | "Walk me through your typical day" | Understanding environment |
| Behavior | "Show me how you do X" | Observing actual actions |
| Goals | "What are you trying to achieve?" | Uncovering motivations |
| Pain | "What's the hardest part?" | Identifying frustrations |
| Reflection | "What would you change?" | Generating ideas |
Knowledge Base
Detailed reference guides in references/:
| File | Content |
|---|---|
persona-methodology.md |
Validity criteria, data collection, analysis framework |
journey-mapping-guide.md |
Mapping process, templates, opportunity identification |
example-personas.md |
3 complete persona examples with data |
usability-testing-frameworks.md |
Test planning, task design, analysis |
Validation Checklist
Persona Quality
- Based on 20+ users (minimum)
- At least 2 data sources (quant + qual)
- Specific, actionable goals
- Frustrations include frequency counts
- Design implications are specific
- Confidence level stated
Journey Map Quality
- Scope clearly defined (persona, goal, timeframe)
- Based on real user data, not assumptions
- All layers filled (actions, touchpoints, emotions)
- Pain points identified per stage
- Opportunities prioritized
Usability Test Quality
- Research questions are testable
- Tasks are realistic scenarios, not instructions
- 5+ participants per design
- Success metrics defined
- Findings include severity ratings
Research Synthesis Quality
- Data coded consistently
- Patterns based on 3+ data points
- Findings include evidence
- Recommendations are actionable
- Priorities justified
Tool Reference
persona_generator.py
Generates data-driven personas from user research data, classifying users into archetypes with demographics, psychographics, behaviors, goals, frustrations, and design implications.
| Argument | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
format |
positional | (none) | Add json for JSON output; omit for human-readable |
Archetypes supported: power_user, casual_user, business_user, mobile_first
Output components: name, archetype, tagline, quote, demographics, psychographics, behaviors, needs_and_goals, frustrations, scenarios, data_points, design_implications
python scripts/persona_generator.py # Human-readable formatted output
python scripts/persona_generator.py json # JSON for programmatic use
Data input format (customize in script):
[{
"user_id": "user_1",
"age": 32,
"usage_frequency": "daily",
"features_used": ["dashboard", "reports", "export"],
"primary_device": "desktop",
"usage_context": "work",
"tech_proficiency": 7,
"pain_points": ["slow loading", "confusing UI"]
}]
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Persona confidence level is "Low" | Fewer than 20 users in sample data | Collect more data points; combine quantitative analytics with qualitative interviews |
| All users classified as same archetype | Insufficient variation in input data | Ensure data includes diverse usage frequencies, devices, and contexts |
| Frustrations are generic (fallback defaults) | Not enough pain_points in user data | Enrich user data with pain_points from interviews and support tickets |
| Design implications too vague | Patterns don't strongly differentiate | Add more behavioral signals (features_used, session duration, task completion) |
| Journey map has flat emotion curve | All stages scored similarly | Re-evaluate with actual user data; conduct contextual interviews per stage |
| Usability test sample too small | Fewer than 5 participants | 5 participants find ~85% of usability issues; recruit to minimum 5 |
| Research synthesis has no clear patterns | Data not coded consistently | Use consistent tagging scheme (GOAL, PAIN, BEHAVIOR, CONTEXT, QUOTE) |
Success Criteria
| Criterion | Target | How to Measure |
|---|---|---|
| Persona validity | Validated by 3+ real users ("sounds like me") | Post-creation validation interviews |
| Persona coverage | All key segments represented | Count of personas vs identified user segments |
| Data confidence level | "High" (31+ users) | persona_generator data_points.confidence_level |
| Research cadence | 5-8 interviews per segment per quarter | Count of completed research sessions |
| Insight-to-action rate | >70% of findings result in design changes | Track findings through to implementation |
| Usability issue resolution | All critical/major issues fixed before release | Issue severity tracking |
| Journey map freshness | Updated at least quarterly | Last-updated date on each journey map |
Scope & Limitations
In scope:
- Data-driven persona generation from user research
- Archetype classification (power, casual, business, mobile-first)
- User journey mapping frameworks
- Usability test planning and scoring
- Research synthesis and coding methodology
- Interview question frameworks
- Empathy map and opportunity identification
Out of scope:
- Automated user interview recording/transcription
- Real-time analytics integration (use analytics platforms)
- Quantitative survey design and distribution (use Typeform/SurveyMonkey)
- Eye tracking or biometric data analysis
- AI-powered sentiment analysis (tool uses heuristic classification)
- Persona illustration or visual asset generation
- Accessibility auditing (see product-designer or design-system-lead skills)
Integration Points
| Tool / Platform | Integration Method | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Dovetail / Condens | Export research data, import persona JSON | Centralize research insights |
| Figma / Miro | Paste persona output as design artifact | Reference personas during design work |
| Notion / Confluence | Human-readable output | Document and share personas with team |
| product-manager-toolkit | Persona pain points inform RICE scoring | Connect user needs to feature prioritization |
| agile-product-owner | Persona data informs user story personas | Write stories grounded in research |
| product-designer | Persona feeds into journey mapping and usability test recruitment | End-to-end design research workflow |
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
churn-prevention
SaaS churn reduction covering cancel flow design, dynamic save offers, exit survey architecture, dunning sequences, payment recovery, win-back campaigns, and churn impact modeling.
popup-cro
Popup and modal optimization for conversion. Covers exit-intent, slide-ins, banners, timing optimization, frequency capping, audience targeting, compliance, and A/B testing frameworks for lead capture, promotions, and announcements.
competitor-alternatives
Competitor comparison and alternative page creation for SEO and sales enablement. Covers 4 page formats (singular alternative, plural alternatives, vs pages, competitor vs competitor), content architecture, research methodology, and centralized competitor data management.
contract-and-proposal-writer
Generate production-ready business documents including freelance contracts, project proposals, SOWs, NDAs, and MSAs with jurisdiction-aware clauses. Covers US (Delaware), EU (GDPR), UK, and DACH (German law) legal frameworks. Includes contract templates, clause libraries, and DOCX conversion. Use when starting client engagements, writing proposals, drafting partnership agreements, or needing GDPR-compliant data processing addenda.
pricing-strategy
SaaS pricing design and optimization covering value metric selection, tier architecture, price point research, pricing page design, price increase execution, and competitive pricing analysis.
referral-program
Referral and affiliate program design covering referral loop architecture, incentive design, trigger moment optimization, viral coefficient modeling, affiliate program structure, and optimization playbook.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?