Agent skill
testing-llm
LLM and AI testing patterns — mock responses, evaluation with DeepEval/RAGAS, structured output validation, and agentic test patterns (generator, healer, planner). Use when testing AI features, validating LLM outputs, or building evaluation pipelines.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit/tree/main/src/skills/testing-llm
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- category
- document-asset-creation
SKILL.md
LLM & AI Testing Patterns
Patterns and tools for testing LLM integrations, evaluating AI output quality, mocking responses for deterministic CI, and applying agentic test workflows (planner, generator, healer).
Quick Reference
| Area | File | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Rules | rules/llm-evaluation.md |
DeepEval quality metrics, Pydantic schema validation, timeout testing |
| Rules | rules/llm-mocking.md |
Mock LLM responses, VCR.py recording, custom request matchers |
| Reference | references/deepeval-ragas-api.md |
Full API reference for DeepEval and RAGAS metrics |
| Reference | references/generator-agent.md |
Transforms Markdown specs into Playwright tests |
| Reference | references/healer-agent.md |
Auto-fixes failing tests (selectors, waits, dynamic content) |
| Reference | references/planner-agent.md |
Explores app and produces Markdown test plans |
| Checklist | checklists/llm-test-checklist.md |
Complete LLM testing checklist (setup, coverage, CI/CD) |
| Example | examples/llm-test-patterns.md |
Full examples: mocking, structured output, DeepEval, VCR, golden datasets |
When to Use This Skill
- Testing code that calls LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
- Validating RAG pipeline output quality
- Setting up deterministic LLM tests in CI
- Building evaluation pipelines with quality gates
- Applying agentic test patterns (plan -> generate -> heal)
LLM Mock Quick Start
Mock LLM responses for fast, deterministic unit tests:
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
import pytest
@pytest.fixture
def mock_llm():
mock = AsyncMock()
mock.return_value = {"content": "Mocked response", "confidence": 0.85}
return mock
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_with_mocked_llm(mock_llm):
with patch("app.core.model_factory.get_model", return_value=mock_llm):
result = await synthesize_findings(sample_findings)
assert result["summary"] is not None
Key rule: NEVER call live LLM APIs in CI. Use mocks for unit tests, VCR.py for integration tests.
DeepEval Quality Quick Start
Validate LLM output quality with multi-dimensional metrics:
from deepeval import assert_test
from deepeval.test_case import LLMTestCase
from deepeval.metrics import AnswerRelevancyMetric, FaithfulnessMetric
test_case = LLMTestCase(
input="What is the capital of France?",
actual_output="The capital of France is Paris.",
retrieval_context=["Paris is the capital of France."],
)
assert_test(test_case, [
AnswerRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7),
FaithfulnessMetric(threshold=0.8),
])
Quality Metrics Thresholds
| Metric | Threshold | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Answer Relevancy | >= 0.7 | Response addresses question |
| Faithfulness | >= 0.8 | Output matches context |
| Hallucination | <= 0.3 | No fabricated facts |
| Context Precision | >= 0.7 | Retrieved contexts relevant |
| Context Recall | >= 0.7 | All relevant contexts retrieved |
Structured Output Validation
Always validate LLM output with Pydantic schemas:
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
class LLMResponse(BaseModel):
answer: str = Field(min_length=1)
confidence: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0)
sources: list[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
async def test_structured_output():
result = await get_llm_response("test query")
parsed = LLMResponse.model_validate(result)
assert 0 <= parsed.confidence <= 1.0
VCR.py for Integration Tests
Record and replay LLM API calls for deterministic integration tests:
@pytest.fixture(scope="module")
def vcr_config():
import os
return {
"record_mode": "none" if os.environ.get("CI") else "new_episodes",
"filter_headers": ["authorization", "x-api-key"],
}
@pytest.mark.vcr()
async def test_llm_integration():
response = await llm_client.complete("Say hello")
assert "hello" in response.content.lower()
Agentic Test Workflow
The three-agent pattern for end-to-end test automation:
Planner -> specs/*.md -> Generator -> tests/*.spec.ts -> Healer (auto-fix)
-
Planner (
references/planner-agent.md): Explores your app, produces Markdown test plans from PRDs or natural language requests. Requiresseed.spec.tsfor app context. -
Generator (
references/generator-agent.md): Converts Markdown specs into Playwright tests. Actively validates selectors against the running app. Uses semantic locators (getByRole, getByLabel, getByText). -
Healer (
references/healer-agent.md): Automatically fixes failing tests by replaying failures, inspecting the DOM, and patching locators/waits. Max 3 healing attempts per test.
Edge Cases to Always Test
For every LLM integration, cover these paths:
- Empty/null inputs -- empty strings, None values
- Long inputs -- truncation behavior near token limits
- Timeouts -- fail-open vs fail-closed behavior
- Schema violations -- invalid structured output
- Prompt injection -- adversarial input resistance
- Unicode -- non-ASCII characters in prompts and responses
See checklists/llm-test-checklist.md for the complete checklist.
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Correct Approach |
|---|---|
| Live LLM calls in CI | Mock for unit, VCR for integration |
| Random seeds | Fixed seeds or mocked responses |
| Single metric evaluation | 3-5 quality dimensions |
| No timeout handling | Always set < 1s timeout in tests |
| Hardcoded API keys | Environment variables, filtered in VCR |
Asserting only is not None |
Schema validation + quality metrics |
Related Skills
ork:testing-unit— Unit testing fundamentals, AAA patternork:testing-integration— Integration testing for AI pipelinesork:golden-dataset— Evaluation dataset management
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
expect
Diff-aware AI browser testing — analyzes git changes, generates targeted test plans, and executes them via agent-browser. Reads git diff to determine what changed, maps changes to affected pages via route map, generates a test plan scoped to the diff, and runs it with pass/fail reporting. Use when testing UI changes, verifying PRs before merge, running regression checks on changed components, or validating that recent code changes don't break the user-facing experience.
github-operations
GitHub CLI operations for issues, PRs, milestones, and Projects v2. Covers gh commands, REST API patterns, and automation scripts. Use when managing GitHub issues, PRs, milestones, or Projects with gh.
chain-patterns
Chain patterns for CC 2.1.71 pipelines — MCP detection, handoff files, checkpoint-resume, worktree agents, CronCreate monitoring. Use when building multi-phase pipeline skills. Loaded via skills: field by pipeline skills (fix-issue, implement, brainstorm, verify). Not user-invocable.
storybook-mcp-integration
Storybook MCP server integration for component-aware AI development. Covers 6 tools across 3 toolsets (dev, docs, testing): component discovery via list-all-documentation/get-documentation, story previews via preview-stories, and automated testing via run-story-tests. Use when generating components that should reuse existing Storybook components, running component tests via MCP, or previewing stories in chat.
component-search
Search 21st.dev component registry for production-ready React components. Finds components by natural language description, filters by framework and style system, returns ranked results with install instructions. Use when looking for UI components, finding alternatives to existing components, or sourcing design system building blocks.
ai-ui-generation
AI-assisted UI generation patterns for json-render, v0, Bolt, and Cursor workflows. Covers prompt engineering for component generation, review checklists for AI-generated code, design token injection, refactoring for design system conformance, and CI gates for quality assurance. Use when generating UI components with AI tools, rendering multi-surface MCP visual output, reviewing AI-generated code, or integrating AI output into design systems.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?