Agent skill
testing
Testing workflow and quality standards for writing and running tests. Use when: (1) Writing new tests, (2) Adding a new feature that needs tests, (3) Modifying logic that has existing tests, (4) Before claiming a task is complete.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/iOfficeAI/AionUi/tree/main/.claude/skills/testing
SKILL.md
Testing Skill
Standards and workflow for writing and running tests. Every feature must be tested.
Announce at start: "I'm using testing skill to ensure proper test coverage."
Trigger Conditions
- Writing new tests for a feature or bug fix
- Adding a new feature (must include tests)
- Modifying logic that has existing tests (must update them)
- Before claiming work is complete
- Before committing code
Framework
Vitest 4 — configured in vitest.config.ts.
Test Structure
tests/
├── unit/ # Individual functions, utilities, components
├── integration/ # IPC, database, service interactions
├── regression/ # Regression test cases
└── e2e/ # End-to-end tests (Playwright, playwright.config.ts)
Two Test Environments
| Environment | When | File naming |
|---|---|---|
node (default) |
Main process, utilities, services | *.test.ts |
jsdom |
DOM/browser-dependent code | *.dom.test.ts |
Workflow
Step 1: Identify What to Test
Before writing tests, list the riskiest scenarios first:
- What happens when the dependency returns
undefined/ throws? - What happens at boundaries (empty list, max retries, past timestamp)?
- What is most likely to break in production?
Step 2: Write Tests
Follow these quality rules:
1. Describe behavior, not code structure
// Wrong — describes implementation
it('should call repo.getConversation', ...)
// Correct — describes behavior
it('should return cached task without hitting repo on second call', ...)
it('should reject with error when conversation does not exist', ...)
2. Every describe block must cover at least one failure path
Happy-path-only tests leave the most dangerous code untested.
3. One behavior per test
Keep each it() focused. More than 3 expect() calls in one test is a signal it is testing too much at once.
4. Self-check
After writing a test, mentally delete the core logic it targets. If the test would still pass, rewrite it — it is not guarding anything.
5. Start from risk, not from coverage gaps
List scenarios most likely to produce bugs. Write those first. Coverage is the outcome, not the starting point.
Step 3: Run Tests
bun run test # Run all tests (REQUIRED before every commit)
bun run test:coverage # Check coverage (before opening a PR)
Step 4: Verify Coverage
Coverage target: ≥ 80% for all source files matched by vitest.config.ts → coverage.include (currently src/**/*.{ts,tsx} plus a few scripts).
New source files are automatically included in coverage — no manual config changes needed. If a new file is accidentally excluded by a rule in coverage.exclude, remove it from the exclude list.
Step 5: Update Existing Tests
When modifying logic, check if existing tests need updating:
bun run test -- --reporter=verbose # See which tests pass/fail with names
If a test fails because the behavior changed intentionally, update the test. If it fails unexpectedly, investigate.
Edge Case Checklist
When testing a module, verify:
-
null/undefinedinputs handled - Empty arrays/objects handled
- Error thrown by dependencies handled
- Boundary values (0, -1, max, empty string)
- Async operations (timeout, rejection, cancellation)
Quick Checklist
Before submitting code:
- New features have corresponding test cases
- Modified logic has updated tests
-
bun run testpasses - Tests describe behavior, not implementation
- At least one failure path per describe block
- New source files are not accidentally excluded by
coverage.exclude -
bun run test:coveragemeets ≥ 80% target
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Correct |
|---|---|
| Testing implementation details | Test observable behavior |
| Only testing happy path | Must include at least one failure path |
5+ expects in one it() |
Split into separate tests |
| Skipping tests for "simple" code | Simple code breaks too — test the risky parts |
| Writing tests after saying "done" | Tests are part of "done", not an afterthought |
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
i18n
Internationalization (i18n) workflow and standards for managing translations. Use when: (1) Adding new user-facing text, (2) Creating new components with user-facing text, (3) Reviewing code for i18n compliance, (4) Adding a new translation module.
pr-automation
PR Automation Orchestrator: poll open PRs, check CI, run review, fix, and merge eligible PRs. Use when: (1) Invoked by daemon via scripts/pr-automation.sh, (2) User says "/pr-automation".
architecture
Project architecture and file structure conventions for all process types. Use when: (1) Creating new files or modules, (2) Deciding where code should go, (3) Converting single-file components to directories, (4) Reviewing code for structure compliance, (5) Adding new bridges, services, agents, or workers.
pr-review
PR Code Review (Local): perform a thorough local code review with full project context. Use when: (1) User asks to review a PR, (2) User says "/pr-review", (3) User wants to review code changes before merging.
bump-version
pr-fix
PR Review Fix: automatically fix all issues identified in a pr-review report. Use when: (1) User says "fix all review issues", (2) User says "/pr-fix", (3) After pr-review skill has produced a report, (4) User wants to address PR review feedback.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?