Agent skill
review-code
Review code changes for quality, security, and performance. Use when user says "review my changes", "do a code review", "check this for issues", "analyze code quality", "security review", "performance review", "is this PR ready", or needs architecture, security, performance, and style analysis.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/Uniswap/ai-toolkit/tree/next/packages/plugins/development-pr-workflow/skills/review-code
SKILL.md
Code Reviewer
Comprehensive code review using multi-agent coordination for architecture, security, performance, and style analysis.
When to Activate
- User asks for code review (any context)
- User wants changes reviewed before merge
- User needs security or performance analysis
- User asks "is this ready?"
- PR quality check needed
- User mentions reviewing changes before commit/PR
- User asks about code issues or improvements
Inputs
Parse from request:
- paths: Files or directories to review (defaults to current git changes)
- --depth: Review depth (standard|comprehensive) - default: standard
- --focus: Specific aspects (architecture|security|performance|all) - default: all
- --suggest-fixes: Generate fix suggestions (default: true)
- --check-tests: Review test coverage (default: false)
- --baseline: Compare against baseline branch (default: main)
Quick Process
- Gather Context: Get diff, changed files, commit messages
- Analyze: Understand intent and scope
- Multi-Agent Review: Architecture, security, performance, style
- Generate Fixes: Actionable improvements
- Summarize: Recommendation with action items
Review Depth
| Depth | Agents | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | 4 | Quick validation of key concerns |
| Comprehensive | 8+ | Deep multi-phase analysis |
Orchestration Strategy
Phase 1: Code Analysis Preparation
-
Identify Review Scope:
- If no paths provided, get current git changes
- Expand directories to file lists
- Filter by file types and patterns
-
Context Loading:
- Invoke context-loader to understand surrounding code
- Identify architectural patterns and conventions
- Load relevant documentation and standards
Phase 2: Multi-Agent Review
Invoke agents to coordinate parallel analysis:
- Code Quality: style-enforcer, refactorer, code-explainer
- Architecture & Design: pattern consistency, design validation
- Security & Performance: security-analyzer, performance-analyzer
- Testing: test-writer (coverage gaps)
Phase 3: Deep Analysis (if --depth comprehensive)
For comprehensive review, additional specialized analysis:
- Dependency Analysis: Check for circular dependencies, validate imports
- Pattern Consistency: Compare with existing patterns, identify deviations
- Impact Analysis: Assess breaking changes, affected components
Phase 4: Result Aggregation
Combine insights from all agents:
-
Issue Prioritization:
- Critical: Security vulnerabilities, breaking changes
- High: Performance issues, architectural violations
- Medium: Style inconsistencies, missing tests
- Low: Minor improvements, documentation
-
Fix Generation:
- Automated fixes for style issues
- Refactoring suggestions with examples
- Security patches with explanations
Review Categories
- Architecture: Pattern compliance, SOLID, dependencies
- Security: Vulnerabilities, auth, injection risks
- Performance: Complexity, queries, caching
- Maintainability: Complexity, coverage, duplication
- Testing: Coverage gaps, test quality
Specialized Review Modes
Architecture Focus (--focus architecture)
- Emphasize design patterns and structure
- Validate SOLID principles
- Check dependency management
- Assess modularity and coupling
Security Focus (--focus security)
- Deep vulnerability scanning
- Input validation checks
- Authentication/authorization review
- Secrets and credential scanning
Performance Focus (--focus performance)
- Algorithm complexity analysis
- Memory usage patterns
- Database query optimization
- Caching opportunities
Output Format
Provides:
- Summary: Intent, scope, risk assessment, files reviewed, issues by severity
- Findings: By severity (critical, major, minor) with file, line, explanation
- Architecture Insights: Patterns, violations, recommendations
- Security Report: Vulnerabilities, severity, mitigation
- Performance Report: Bottlenecks, impact, optimization
- Test Coverage: Current coverage, gaps, suggested tests
- Action Plan: Must-fix, should-fix, consider lists
- Patches: Actionable diffs with automated fix commands
Recommendation
Returns: approve, request-changes, or comment
Examples
"Review my code changes"
"Check this file for security issues"
"Deep review of src/api/ focusing on performance"
"Review code quality in the authentication module"
"Is this PR ready to merge?"
Delegation
Invokes specialized agents (style-enforcer, security-analyzer, performance-analyzer, code-explainer, refactorer, test-writer) for comprehensive multi-dimensional analysis.
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
review-plan
Review implementation plans for completeness and feasibility. Use when user says "review this plan before I start", "is this implementation plan complete", "check if this plan aligns with our patterns", "give me feedback on my implementation strategy", or "validate this plan before we execute it".
plan-implementation
Create implementation plans for features and changes. Use when user says "plan how to implement user authentication", "how should I add dark mode to the app", "what's the best way to refactor the database layer", "create a plan for migrating to the new API", or "I need to implement [feature] - help me plan it out".
execute-plan
Execute implementation plans step-by-step. Use when user says "execute the plan", "implement the plan we created", "start building based on the plan", "go ahead and implement it", "proceed with the implementation", "execute as a stack", "create a PR stack while implementing", "implement with one PR per step", or references a plan file and wants to begin coding.
generate-commit-message
Generate well-structured git commit messages. Use when user says "generate commit message", "write a commit", "what should my commit message be", "create commit message for these changes", or needs help crafting conventional commit messages.
plan-swarm
Refine plans through multi-agent expert discussion. Use when user says "get multiple expert opinions on this plan", "I want different perspectives on this approach", "have the agents discuss this strategy", "refine the plan through collaborative review", or "what would different specialists think about this design".
create-pr
Create or update pull requests with conventional commits. Use when user says "create a PR for these changes", "submit this for review", "open a pull request", "push these changes and create a PR", "I'm ready to submit this work", or "create PR and link to issue
Didn't find tool you were looking for?