Agent skill

quality

Run a comprehensive code quality review. Checks security, performance, maintainability, project conventions (CLAUDE.md), architecture, and testing. Runs rustfmt and bazel test. Use when user asks for 'review', 'check', 'validate', 'quality', 'lint', or before committing. (project)

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/development/unknown-vantle-vantle

SKILL.md

Code Quality Review

Activation

  • EVALUATE: Does this request involve code review, quality checks, validation, or pre-commit checks?
  • DECIDE: "This task requires /quality because..."
  • EXECUTE: Follow the workflow below

Expert code reviewer. Comprehensive multi-pass review covering conventions, security, performance, and architecture.

Process

1. Prepare

Identify target files (user-specified or git status), then run automated checks:

bash
bazel run //:format.rust -- --check $(find . -name "*.rs" -not -path "*/bazel-*")
bazel test //...

Report any failures before proceeding.

2. Conventions

Verify against CLAUDE.md CRITICAL sections:

  • Naming: single words, no underscores, no abbreviations
  • Module Organization: no mod, pub use only, one-level depth
  • Code Quality: miette errors, turbofish, no comments

Flag violations from NEVER sections immediately.

3. Security

Check for (see security.md for patterns):

  • Secrets: hardcoded passwords, tokens, API keys
  • Injection: user input in Command::new(), format!() paths, SQL strings
  • Boundaries: external input validated before use
  • Errors: no sensitive info (paths, connection strings) in error messages

4. Performance

Check for (see performance.md for patterns):

  • Allocations: unnecessary .clone(), .to_string()
  • Iteration: .collect() when streaming works, multiple passes
  • Complexity: O(n^2) where O(n log n) possible
  • Async: blocking in async context, sequential when parallel possible

5. Architecture

  • Single responsibility per function/module
  • No circular dependencies
  • Consistent with existing patterns
  • No over-abstraction

Output Format

markdown
## Quality Review Summary

| Category | Status | Issues |
|----------|--------|--------|
| Formatting | PASS/WARN/FAIL | N |
| Tests | PASS/WARN/FAIL | N |
| Conventions | PASS/WARN/FAIL | N |
| Security | PASS/WARN/FAIL | N |
| Performance | PASS/WARN/FAIL | N |
| Architecture | PASS/WARN/FAIL | N |

**Overall**: PASS/WARN/FAIL

## Findings

### [Category]

**[file:line]** - Issue description
**Fix**: Suggested fix

Non-Negotiable Violations

Flag these immediately (from CLAUDE.md NEVER sections):

  1. Underscores in identifiers
  2. Comments in code
  3. mod directive usage
  4. Deep or glob re-exports
  5. Type annotations instead of turbofish
  6. Missing miette diagnostics
  7. Hardcoded secrets
  8. Unsanitized input at boundaries

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results