Agent skill
project-status
Analyze project state from .aiwg/ artifacts and provide contextual status with recommended next steps
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg/tree/main/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/project-status
SKILL.md
Project Status
Task
Analyze .aiwg/ artifacts to determine project state and provide actionable status report with phase-appropriate next commands.
When invoked with /project-status [project-directory]:
- Scan
.aiwg/directory for artifacts - Detect current SDLC phase and workflow state
- Analyze completion of phase milestones
- Identify blockers and gaps
- Recommend next commands based on current state
Parameters
[project-directory](optional): Path to project root (default: current directory.)
Inputs
Scans .aiwg/ directory for:
- Intake:
intake/project-intake.md,solution-profile.md,option-matrix.md - Planning:
planning/phase-plan-*.md,planning/iteration-plan-*.md - Requirements:
requirements/*.md - Architecture:
architecture/SAD.md,architecture/ADR-*.md - Risks:
risks/risk-list.md - Testing:
testing/test-*.md - Security:
security/threat-model.md,security/security-*.md - Quality:
quality/code-review-*.md,quality/retrospective-*.md - Deployment:
deployment/deployment-plan.md - Gates:
gates/gate-*.md - Handoffs:
handoffs/handoff-*.md - Decisions:
decisions/change-*.md - Team:
team/team-profile.yaml,team/agent-assignments.md
Outputs
Console output: Formatted status report with phase detection, milestone progress, blockers, and recommended next steps.
Workflow
Step 1: Discover .aiwg/ Structure
# Check if .aiwg/ exists
ls .aiwg/ 2>/dev/null
# If not found, check for legacy intake/ directory
ls intake/ 2>/dev/null
Decision:
- If
.aiwg/exists → proceed with analysis - If only
intake/exists → warn about legacy location, proceed with limited analysis - If neither exists → report "No SDLC artifacts found. Run
/intake-wizardto start."
Step 2: Detect Current Phase
Phase Detection Logic (priority order):
-
Pre-Inception (No intake):
- Condition: No
.aiwg/intake/directory OR intake files missing - Status: "Project not started"
- Next: Choose ONE intake method:
/intake-wizard(interactive generation)/intake-from-codebase(analyze existing code)/intake-start(enhance user-provided intake files)
- Condition: No
-
Inception (Intake complete, no phase plan):
- Condition: Intake files present + NO
planning/phase-plan-inception.md - Status: "Intake complete, ready for Inception"
- Next:
/flow-concept-to-inception
- Condition: Intake files present + NO
-
Inception Active (Phase plan exists, not complete):
- Condition:
planning/phase-plan-inception.mdexists + NOgates/gate-inception.mdOR gate status ≠ PASSED - Status: "Inception phase active"
- Next: Continue Inception activities, complete gate check
- Condition:
-
Elaboration (Inception gate passed, elaboration active):
- Condition:
gates/gate-inception.mdPASSED +planning/phase-plan-elaboration.mdexists - Status: "Elaboration phase active"
- Next: Architecture baseline, risk retirement, iteration planning
- Condition:
-
Construction (Elaboration gate passed, construction active):
- Condition:
gates/gate-elaboration.mdPASSED +planning/iteration-plan-*.csvexists - Status: "Construction phase active (Iteration N)"
- Next: Feature delivery, testing, iteration assessments
- Condition:
-
Transition (Construction complete, deployment prep):
- Condition:
gates/gate-construction.mdPASSED +deployment/deployment-plan.mdexists - Status: "Transition phase active"
- Next: Deployment, training, hypercare monitoring
- Condition:
-
Production (Deployed):
- Condition:
deployment/production-deployment-*.mdexists with "Status: Deployed" - Status: "In production"
- Next: Monitoring, incident response, continuous improvement
- Condition:
Step 3: Analyze Phase Completeness
For detected phase, check milestone artifacts:
Inception Milestone Artifacts
Required:
-
intake/project-intake.md- Project vision and scope -
intake/solution-profile.md- Profile and improvement roadmap -
intake/option-matrix.md- Priorities and framework application -
planning/phase-plan-inception.md- Inception activities -
risks/risk-list.md- Initial risk register -
team/agent-assignments.md- Agent assignments
Optional but Recommended:
-
architecture/ADR-001-*.md- Initial architecture decisions -
requirements/vision.md- Business case and vision -
requirements/business-case.md- Funding and ROI
Gate Criteria (for gates/gate-inception.md):
- Stakeholder agreement on vision, scope, funding
- Critical use cases identified
- Initial risk list baselined
- Architecture direction proposed
Elaboration Milestone Artifacts
Required:
-
planning/phase-plan-elaboration.md- Elaboration activities -
architecture/SAD.md- Software Architecture Document -
architecture/executable-prototype.md- Architectural baseline -
requirements/use-case-*.md- Use case specifications (3+ architecturally significant) -
requirements/supplementary-requirements.md- NFRs -
planning/iteration-plan-elaboration.csv- Iteration plan -
risks/risk-list.md- Updated with retired HIGH risks
Optional but Recommended:
-
architecture/ADR-*.md- Multiple ADRs (5-10) -
testing/test-strategy.md- Test approach -
security/threat-model.md- Security analysis -
deployment/cm-plan.md- Configuration management -
team/development-case.md- Process tailoring
Gate Criteria (for gates/gate-elaboration.md):
- Executable architectural prototype validated
- Baseline architecture document approved
- Top 3-5 HIGH risks retired or mitigated
- Iteration plan for Construction baselined
Construction Milestone Artifacts
Required:
-
planning/iteration-plan-*.csv- Iteration plans (multiple) -
quality/iteration-assessment-*.md- Iteration assessments -
testing/test-results-*.md- Test evidence (unit, integration, E2E) -
requirements/use-case-*.md- All use cases implemented -
deployment/integration-build-plan.md- CI/CD pipeline
Optional but Recommended:
-
quality/code-review-*.md- Code review reports -
testing/test-coverage-report.md- Coverage metrics -
quality/retrospective-*.md- Sprint retrospectives -
architecture/ADR-*.md- Additional ADRs for design decisions -
security/security-review-*.md- Security validations
Gate Criteria (for gates/gate-construction.md):
- Feature set meets acceptance tests
- Test coverage targets met (60-80%+)
- Defects triaged (no open HIGH/CRITICAL)
- Deployment pipeline proven
- Performance targets validated
Transition Milestone Artifacts
Required:
-
deployment/deployment-plan.md- Rollout plan -
deployment/release-notes.md- User-facing documentation -
team/training-pack.md- Training materials -
deployment/support-handover.md- Support readiness -
testing/product-acceptance-plan.md- Final acceptance tests -
deployment/rollback-plan.md- Rollback procedures
Optional but Recommended:
-
deployment/runbook.md- Operational procedures -
security/security-sign-off.md- Security approval -
quality/orr-checklist.md- Operational Readiness Review -
team/knowledge-transfer-*.md- Knowledge handoff -
deployment/hypercare-plan.md- Post-launch monitoring
Gate Criteria (for gates/gate-transition.md):
- Users trained
- Release criteria met
- Support handover accepted
- Production deployment successful
- Hypercare monitoring active
Step 4: Identify Blockers and Gaps
Critical Blockers (stop progress):
- Missing required artifacts for current phase
- Failed gate checks (status: FAILED or BLOCKED)
- Open HIGH/CRITICAL risks with no mitigation
- Critical decisions pending resolution
- Test coverage below threshold for profile
Important Gaps (slow progress):
- Optional artifacts missing (ADRs, test strategy)
- Moderate risks without mitigation plans
- Incomplete iteration assessments
- Missing retrospectives (learning opportunities)
- Security reviews overdue
Minor Gaps (nice to have):
- Documentation gaps (runbooks, training materials)
- Metrics not tracked
- Process improvements not documented
Step 5: Recommend Next Commands
Based on phase and state, recommend 3-5 most relevant commands:
Pre-Inception → Intake Complete
**Recommended Next Steps**:
Choose ONE intake method:
1. **Generate intake interactively** (recommended for new projects):
- `/intake-wizard "your project description"`
- Or complete partial intake: `/intake-wizard --complete --interactive`
2. **Generate intake from codebase** (for existing projects):
- `/intake-from-codebase .`
3. **Enhance user-provided intake files** (if you manually created intake docs):
- `/intake-start .aiwg/intake/`
Intake Complete → Inception Active
**Recommended Next Steps**:
1. **Begin Concept → Inception flow**:
- `/flow-concept-to-inception`
- Natural language: "Start Inception" or "Let's begin Inception phase"
2. **Initiate risk management**:
- `/flow-risk-management-cycle`
3. **Document architecture decisions** (if not done):
- Manually create `architecture/ADR-001-<decision>.md`
Inception Active → Elaboration
**Recommended Next Steps**:
1. **Check Inception gate readiness**:
- `/flow-gate-check inception`
2. **If gate passed, transition to Elaboration**:
- `/flow-inception-to-elaboration .aiwg/`
3. **Blockers** (if gate not ready):
- {list missing artifacts}
- {list open HIGH risks}
- {list pending decisions}
Elaboration Active → Construction
**Recommended Next Steps**:
1. **Build architectural baseline**:
- `/build-poc <feature-or-risk>` (for risky architecture)
- Manually create `architecture/SAD.md` and `architecture/executable-prototype.md`
2. **Evolve architecture**:
- `/flow-architecture-evolution <trigger>`
3. **Retire risks**:
- `/flow-risk-management-cycle .aiwg/`
4. **Define test strategy**:
- `/flow-test-strategy-execution <test-level>`
5. **Check Elaboration gate readiness**:
- `/flow-gate-check elaboration`
6. **If gate passed, transition to Construction**:
- `/flow-elaboration-to-construction .aiwg/`
Construction Active (Iterations)
**Recommended Next Steps**:
1. **Run dual-track iteration** (recommended):
- `/flow-iteration-dual-track <iteration-number>`
2. **Or separate Discovery and Delivery**:
- `/flow-discovery-track <iteration-number+1>` (plan ahead)
- `/flow-delivery-track <iteration-number>` (deliver current)
3. **Execute test strategy**:
- `/flow-test-strategy-execution <test-level> <component>`
4. **Manage evolving requirements**:
- `/flow-requirements-evolution .aiwg/ --iteration <N>`
5. **Review security**:
- `/flow-security-review-cycle .aiwg/ --iteration <N>`
6. **Conduct retrospective** (end of iteration):
- `/flow-retrospective-cycle iteration <iteration-number>`
7. **Check Construction gate readiness** (when feature complete):
- `/flow-gate-check construction`
Construction → Transition
**Recommended Next Steps**:
1. **Validate Construction gate**:
- `/flow-gate-check construction`
2. **If gate passed, transition to Transition**:
- `/flow-construction-to-transition .aiwg/`
3. **Blockers** (if gate not ready):
- {list failing tests}
- {list coverage gaps}
- {list open defects}
Transition Active → Production
**Recommended Next Steps**:
1. **Deploy to production**:
- `/flow-deploy-to-production <blue-green|canary> <version>`
2. **Validate handoffs**:
- `/flow-handoff-checklist Construction Transition`
3. **Initiate hypercare monitoring**:
- `/flow-hypercare-monitoring <duration-days>`
4. **Check Transition gate readiness**:
- `/flow-gate-check transition`
Production (Ongoing)
**Recommended Next Steps**:
1. **Monitor health**:
- `/project-health-check`
2. **Respond to incidents** (if issues):
- `/flow-incident-response <incident-id> <severity>`
3. **Optimize performance** (if degradation):
- `/flow-performance-optimization <trigger> <component>`
4. **Validate compliance** (periodic):
- `/flow-compliance-validation <framework>`
5. **Onboard new team members** (if team growing):
- `/flow-team-onboarding <name> <role>`
6. **Conduct retrospective** (periodic):
- `/flow-retrospective-cycle release <version>`
Step 6: Generate Status Report
Output Format:
# Project Status Report
**Generated**: {current date and time}
**Project**: {from intake/project-intake.md metadata, or "Unknown"}
**Profile**: {from intake/solution-profile.md, or "Not Set"}
**Priority**: {from intake/option-matrix.md Step 3 top weight, or "Not Set"}
---
## Current Phase
**Phase**: {Pre-Inception | Inception | Elaboration | Construction | Transition | Production}
**Status**: {Not Started | Active | Blocked | Complete}
**Duration**: {calculated from phase-plan dates, if available}
{Brief description of phase focus}
---
## Milestone Progress
### {Current Phase} Milestone
**Required Artifacts**: {X/Y complete}
- [x] {completed artifact 1}
- [x] {completed artifact 2}
- [ ] {missing artifact 1} ← **REQUIRED**
- [ ] {missing artifact 2} ← **REQUIRED**
**Optional Artifacts**: {X/Y complete}
- [x] {completed optional 1}
- [ ] {missing optional 1}
**Gate Criteria**: {X/Y met}
- [x] {met criterion 1}
- [ ] {unmet criterion 1} ← **BLOCKER**
---
## Risks and Blockers
### Critical Blockers (Stop Progress)
{If none: "✅ No critical blockers"}
1. **{Blocker 1}**
- Impact: {description}
- Resolution: {recommended action}
- Owner: {agent or team member}
2. **{Blocker 2}**
- Impact: {description}
- Resolution: {recommended action}
- Owner: {agent or team member}
### Important Gaps (Slow Progress)
{If none: "✅ No important gaps"}
- {Gap 1}: {description and recommendation}
- {Gap 2}: {description and recommendation}
### Active Risks
{Read from risks/risk-list.md, show top 3-5 HIGH/MEDIUM risks}
**Risk #{n}**: {risk name}
- Status: {Identified | Mitigating | Monitoring}
- Impact: {HIGH | MEDIUM}
- Mitigation: {summary of strategies}
---
## Team and Velocity
**Team Size**: {from intake/project-intake.md or team/team-profile.yaml}
**Current Iteration**: {from planning/iteration-plan-*.csv, if in Construction}
**Active Agents**: {from team/agent-assignments.md, if exists}
{If iteration data available:}
**Velocity**: {completed story points / planned story points}
**Test Coverage**: {from testing/test-coverage-report.md, if exists}
**Open Defects**: {from quality/ or testing/, if tracked}
---
## Recommended Next Steps
{Based on phase and state, show 3-5 most relevant commands}
### Immediate Actions
1. **{Command 1}**
```bash
/{command-name} {args}
{Why: brief explanation}
- {Command 2}
bash{Why: brief explanation}
/{command-name} {args}
Follow-Up Actions
-
{Command 3}
bash/{command-name} {args}{Why: brief explanation}
-
{Command 4}
bash/{command-name} {args}{Why: brief explanation}
Quick Reference
All Available Commands:
Intake Methods (choose ONE):
/intake-wizard- Generate intake interactively/intake-from-codebase- Generate intake by analyzing codebase/intake-start- Enhance user-provided intake files
Phase Workflows:
/flow-concept-to-inception- Execute Inception phase/flow-inception-to-elaboration- Transition to Elaboration/flow-elaboration-to-construction- Transition to Construction/flow-construction-to-transition- Transition to Transition/flow-iteration-dual-track- Run Discovery + Delivery iteration/flow-gate-check <phase>- Validate phase gate criteria/flow-risk-management-cycle- Manage project risks/flow-test-strategy-execution- Execute test strategy/flow-security-review-cycle- Security validation/flow-architecture-evolution- Evolve architecture/flow-deploy-to-production- Deploy to production/flow-hypercare-monitoring- Post-launch monitoring/project-health-check- Overall project health/project-status- This report (refresh status)
For complete command list, see .claude/commands/ directory.
Natural Language Support: You can use natural language instead of slash commands:
- Instead of
/project-status, say "Where are we?" or "What's next?" - Instead of
/flow-inception-to-elaboration, say "Transition to Elaboration" or "Start Elaboration" - See
.aiwg/docs/simple-language-translations.mdfor complete translation table
Tip: Run /project-status (or say "Where are we?") anytime to refresh this report and see updated recommendations.
## Phase Progression Reference
**Master Workflow** (happy path):
Pre-Inception ↓ Choose ONE intake method:
- intake-wizard (interactive)
- intake-from-codebase (analyze code)
- intake-start (enhance user files) ↓ Intake Complete ↓ flow-concept-to-inception ↓ Inception (Active) ↓ [Architecture decisions, risk management, team alignment] ↓ flow-gate-check inception → PASSED ↓ flow-inception-to-elaboration ↓ Elaboration (Active) ↓ [Architectural baseline, risk retirement, use case elaboration] build-poc (if needed) flow-architecture-evolution flow-risk-management-cycle ↓ flow-gate-check elaboration → PASSED ↓ flow-elaboration-to-construction ↓ Construction (Active) ↓ [Iterative development] flow-iteration-dual-track (repeated) OR flow-discovery-track + flow-delivery-track flow-test-strategy-execution flow-requirements-evolution flow-security-review-cycle flow-retrospective-cycle ↓ flow-gate-check construction → PASSED ↓ flow-construction-to-transition ↓ Transition (Active) ↓ [Deployment preparation] flow-handoff-checklist flow-deploy-to-production flow-hypercare-monitoring ↓ flow-gate-check transition → PASSED ↓ Production ↓ [Ongoing operations] project-health-check flow-incident-response (as needed) flow-performance-optimization (as needed) flow-compliance-validation (periodic) flow-retrospective-cycle (periodic)
**Continuous Flows** (run throughout lifecycle):
- `flow-risk-management-cycle` - Ongoing risk tracking
- `flow-requirements-evolution` - Living requirements management
- `flow-architecture-evolution` - Architecture refinement
- `flow-security-review-cycle` - Security validation
- `flow-change-control` - Change management
- `flow-retrospective-cycle` - Continuous improvement
**Ad-Hoc Flows** (trigger-based):
- `flow-team-onboarding` - When new team members join
- `flow-knowledge-transfer` - When expertise handoff needed
- `flow-cross-team-sync` - When coordination needed
- `flow-incident-response` - When production issues occur
- `flow-performance-optimization` - When performance degrades
- `flow-compliance-validation` - When compliance audit required
- `build-poc` - When technical risk needs validation
## Error Handling
### No .aiwg/ Directory
```markdown
# Project Status Report
**Status**: ❌ No SDLC artifacts found
The `.aiwg/` directory does not exist in this project.
**Recommended Next Steps**:
1. **Start a new SDLC project**:
```bash
/intake-wizard "your project description"
-
Analyze existing codebase:
bash/intake-from-codebase . -
Learn more:
- See SDLC framework documentation:
agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/README.md - See phase workflows:
agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/plan-act-sdlc.md
- See SDLC framework documentation:
### Corrupted or Incomplete Artifacts
If artifacts exist but are malformed:
- **WARN**: "Found {artifact} but could not parse. May be incomplete or corrupted."
- **Recommendation**: "Review {artifact} manually or regenerate using {command}."
### Conflicting State
If artifacts indicate conflicting states (e.g., Elaboration gate PASSED but no Construction artifacts):
- **WARN**: "Conflicting state detected. Gate passed but next phase not started."
- **Recommendation**: "Run `/flow-{phase}-to-{next-phase}` to transition."
## Best Practices
1. **Run frequently**: Use `/project-status` at start of each work session to orient
2. **After major milestones**: Check status after completing gate checks or phase transitions
3. **When stuck**: If unsure what to do next, check status for recommendations
4. **Team coordination**: Share status report with team to align on current state
5. **Progress tracking**: Compare status reports over time to measure velocity
## Success Criteria
This command succeeds when:
- [ ] `.aiwg/` directory scanned successfully
- [ ] Current phase detected accurately
- [ ] Milestone progress calculated
- [ ] Blockers identified (if any)
- [ ] Next steps recommended (3-5 relevant commands)
- [ ] Status report formatted and output to console
## References
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/addons/aiwg-utils/rules/research-before-decision.md — Scan .aiwg/ artifacts before determining phase; base detection on actual file presence
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/rules/artifact-discovery.md — Artifact discovery patterns used to detect phase and milestone completeness
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/rules/sdlc-orchestration.md — Phase progression model and gate criteria that status detection is based on
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/project-health-check/SKILL.md — Complementary skill that reports code and team health metrics
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/orchestrate-project/SKILL.md — Orchestration skill that this status skill informs with phase context
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
research-document
Generate summaries and literature notes from research papers
research-archive
Package research artifacts for long-term archival
research-cite
Format citations and generate bibliographies
induct-research
Induct research sources into a research repository. Point at an issue, a single file, a directory of papers, or a URI and the skill reads, annotates, and files structured induction tasks — one per source. Similar to address-issues but for research corpora instead of code backlogs.
research-provenance
Query provenance chains and artifact relationships
research-quality
Assess source quality using GRADE methodology
Didn't find tool you were looking for?