Agent skill
pr-review-gh
Create GitHub PRs with gh, fetch review comments, fix them commit-by-commit, and reply to each comment individually with correctly formatted bodies.
Stars
163
Forks
31
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/development/pr-review-gh
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- short description
- GitHub PR and review workflow (gh)
SKILL.md
PR Review Workflow (gh)
Use this skill when you need to create a PR, pull review comments, fix them
incrementally, and reply to each comment individually using gh.
Quick Workflow
- Create/update PR
gh pr create --fill --body-file /tmp/pr_body.txtgh pr edit --body-file /tmp/pr_body.txt
- Fetch review comments
- Summary/comments:
gh pr view <PR> --comments - Structured data:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR>/comments - Pagination (recommended for large threads): add
--paginate - Skip resolved threads by ignoring any comment that already has a reply
(a matching
in_reply_to_idexists) or that is marked resolved in the UI. - Unresolved-only JSON (ignore replied-to threads):
bash
python - <<'PY'
import json, subprocess
raw = subprocess.check_output(
["gh", "api", "--paginate", "repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR>/comments"],
text=True,
)
comments = json.loads(raw)
replied_to = {c.get("in_reply_to_id") for c in comments if c.get("in_reply_to_id")}
unresolved = [
{
"id": c.get("id"),
"html_url": c.get("html_url"),
"path": c.get("path"),
"body": c.get("body"),
}
for c in comments
if c.get("in_reply_to_id") is None and c.get("id") not in replied_to
]
print(json.dumps(unresolved, indent=2))
PY
- Unresolved-only JSON (jq):
bash
gh api --paginate repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR>/comments \
| jq '[. as $all
| ($all | map(select(.in_reply_to_id != null) | .in_reply_to_id) | unique) as $replied
| $all[]
| select(.in_reply_to_id == null and (.id | IN($replied[]) | not))
| {id, html_url, path, body}]'
- Fix review notes commit-by-commit
- For each comment:
- identify the target commit (use
commit_idfrom the review payload, orgit log -- <file>/git blame) - start
git rebase -i <base>and mark the target commitedit - apply the fix
- run validation before committing (normally
make lint,make unit, and any relevant itests) - if the change affects scripts or build tooling, lint/unit may need to be omitted; ask the user and follow their direction
git add <files>git commit -m "! <short change>"- continue the rebase, resolving conflicts if needed
- repeat until all notes addressed
- identify the target commit (use
- Ensure fixes land in the commit the reviewer commented on:
- Keep the fix commit directly after the original commit.
- Confirm the diff for the addressed commit is updated.
- Test after fixes
- Run extensive tests after applying fixes to ensure correctness.
- Prefer
make lintand relevant unit/integration tests. - Run per-fix validation before committing each change.
- After all fixes, run a final validation pass on the full branch.
- Note any tests not run in the PR response.
- Reply to each comment individually (draft replies only)
- Always create or reuse a pending review and attach draft replies to it.
- Create a pending review (omit
eventto keep it draft):gh api -X POST repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR>/reviews -F body='Draft replies'
- Add a draft reply to the pending review with GraphQL (supports replies):
gh api graphql -f query='mutation($pullRequestId:ID!,$pullRequestReviewId:ID!,$inReplyTo:ID!,$body:String!){addPullRequestReviewComment(input:{pullRequestId:$pullRequestId,pullRequestReviewId:$pullRequestReviewId,inReplyTo:$inReplyTo,body:$body}){comment{url body}}}' \ -f pullRequestId=<PR_NODE_ID> \ -f pullRequestReviewId=<REVIEW_NODE_ID> \ -f inReplyTo=<COMMENT_NODE_ID> \ -f body='Acked; updated to ...'
- If a pending review already exists, reuse it; do not submit the review.
- Reply content: describe what changed and how, without referencing commit
hashes, rebases, or internal workflow mechanics. Example:
- “Fixed by changing the default case to return
FailedStatewith an explicit reason, so we fail closed on unexpected statuses.”
- “Fixed by changing the default case to return
Comment Formatting Rules
- Use real newlines, not literal
\n. - For multi-line replies, prefer a heredoc:
bash
gh api -X POST repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR>/comments \
-F in_reply_to=<COMMENT_ID> \
-F body=@- <<'EOF'
Applied fix:
- updated X
- refactored Y
EOF
- Keep replies concise and specific to the change made.
Fetch and Respond Example
-
Find comment IDs:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR>/comments -
Reply:
gh api -X POST repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR>/comments \ -F in_reply_to=<COMMENT_ID> \ -F body='Updated sh() to use argv lists and removed shell=True.'
Notes
gh pr view <PR> --commentsis quick for a read-only pass.- Use
gh api .../pulls/<PR>/commentsto getidvalues for replies. - Keep each review response tied to its specific thread.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?