Agent skill

implementing-pod-security-admission-controller

Implement Kubernetes Pod Security Admission to enforce baseline and restricted security profiles at namespace level using built-in admission controller.

View SKILL.md on GitHub Repository
Stars 4,300
Forks 470

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/implementing-pod-security-admission-controller

SKILL.md

Implementing Pod Security Admission Controller

Overview

Pod Security Admission (PSA) is a built-in Kubernetes admission controller (stable since v1.25) that enforces Pod Security Standards at the namespace level. It replaces the deprecated PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) and provides three security profiles: Privileged, Baseline, and Restricted, with three enforcement modes: enforce, audit, and warn.

When to Use

  • When deploying or configuring implementing pod security admission controller capabilities in your environment
  • When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
  • When building or improving security architecture for this domain
  • When conducting security assessments that require this implementation

Prerequisites

  • Kubernetes v1.25+ (PSA is stable/GA)
  • kubectl with cluster-admin access
  • No dependency on external tools - PSA is built into kube-apiserver

Pod Security Standards

Privileged Profile

  • Unrestricted - No restrictions applied
  • Use case: System-level pods (kube-system, monitoring)

Baseline Profile

  • Minimally restrictive - Prevents known privilege escalation
  • Blocks: privileged containers, hostPID, hostIPC, hostNetwork, hostPorts, certain volume types, adding capabilities beyond runtime defaults

Restricted Profile

  • Heavily restricted - Follows security best practices
  • Requires: non-root, drop ALL capabilities, seccomp RuntimeDefault, read-only root filesystem considerations
  • Blocks: Everything in Baseline plus running as root, privilege escalation, non-approved volume types

Enforcement Modes

Mode Behavior Use Case
enforce Reject pods violating policy Production enforcement
audit Log violations to audit log Pre-enforcement assessment
warn Show warnings to user Developer feedback

Implementation

Apply to Namespace via Labels

yaml
# Restricted enforcement with audit and warn
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: production
  labels:
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: v1.28
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-version: v1.28
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn-version: v1.28
yaml
# Baseline enforcement for staging
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: staging
  labels:
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: baseline
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: v1.28
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-version: v1.28
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn-version: v1.28
yaml
# Privileged for system namespaces
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: kube-system
  labels:
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: privileged

Apply Labels with kubectl

bash
# Set restricted enforcement
kubectl label namespace production \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version=v1.28 \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=restricted \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted

# Set baseline enforcement
kubectl label namespace staging \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=baseline \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=restricted \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted

# Check current labels
kubectl get namespace production -o jsonpath='{.metadata.labels}' | jq .

Dry-Run Testing

bash
# Test what would happen with restricted policy on a namespace
kubectl label --dry-run=server --overwrite namespace staging \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted

# Output shows existing pods that would violate the policy
# Warning: existing pods in namespace "staging" violate the new PodSecurity enforce level "restricted:latest"

Cluster-Wide Defaults (AdmissionConfiguration)

yaml
# /etc/kubernetes/psa-config.yaml
apiVersion: apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
kind: AdmissionConfiguration
plugins:
  - name: PodSecurity
    configuration:
      apiVersion: pod-security.admission.config.k8s.io/v1
      kind: PodSecurityConfiguration
      defaults:
        enforce: baseline
        enforce-version: latest
        audit: restricted
        audit-version: latest
        warn: restricted
        warn-version: latest
      exemptions:
        usernames: []
        runtimeClasses: []
        namespaces:
          - kube-system
          - kube-public
          - kube-node-lease
          - calico-system
          - gatekeeper-system
          - monitoring
          - falco

Apply to API Server

bash
# Add to kube-apiserver manifests
# /etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-apiserver.yaml
spec:
  containers:
  - command:
    - kube-apiserver
    - --admission-control-config-file=/etc/kubernetes/psa-config.yaml
    volumeMounts:
    - name: psa-config
      mountPath: /etc/kubernetes/psa-config.yaml
      readOnly: true
  volumes:
  - name: psa-config
    hostPath:
      path: /etc/kubernetes/psa-config.yaml
      type: File

Compliant Pod Examples

Restricted-Compliant Pod

yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: restricted-pod
  namespace: production
spec:
  securityContext:
    runAsNonRoot: true
    runAsUser: 1000
    runAsGroup: 3000
    fsGroup: 2000
    seccompProfile:
      type: RuntimeDefault
  automountServiceAccountToken: false
  containers:
    - name: app
      image: myregistry/myapp:v1.0.0
      securityContext:
        allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
        readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
        capabilities:
          drop:
            - ALL
      resources:
        limits:
          cpu: 500m
          memory: 256Mi
        requests:
          cpu: 100m
          memory: 128Mi
      volumeMounts:
        - name: tmp
          mountPath: /tmp
  volumes:
    - name: tmp
      emptyDir: {}

Baseline-Compliant Pod

yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: baseline-pod
  namespace: staging
spec:
  containers:
    - name: app
      image: myregistry/myapp:v1.0.0
      securityContext:
        allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
      resources:
        limits:
          cpu: 500m
          memory: 256Mi

Migration from PodSecurityPolicy

Step 1: Audit Current State

bash
# Check existing PSPs
kubectl get psp

# Check which service accounts use which PSP
kubectl get clusterrolebinding -o json | \
  jq '.items[] | select(.roleRef.name | startswith("psp-")) | {name: .metadata.name, subjects: .subjects}'

Step 2: Map PSP to PSA Profiles

bash
# For each namespace, determine required PSA level
for ns in $(kubectl get ns -o jsonpath='{.items[*].metadata.name}'); do
  echo "Namespace: $ns"
  kubectl label --dry-run=server namespace $ns \
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted 2>&1 | head -5
done

Step 3: Apply PSA Labels (Audit First)

bash
# Start with audit mode
kubectl label namespace production \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=restricted \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted

Step 4: Review and Fix Violations

bash
# Check audit logs for violations
kubectl get events --field-selector reason=FailedCreate -A

Step 5: Enable Enforcement

bash
kubectl label namespace production \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted

Monitoring

bash
# Check PSA violations in events
kubectl get events --all-namespaces --field-selector reason=FailedCreate

# Check audit logs
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | grep "pod-security.kubernetes.io"

# List namespace PSA labels
kubectl get namespaces -L pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce

Best Practices

  1. Start with audit+warn before enforce to assess impact
  2. Use dry-run to test enforcement before applying
  3. Exempt system namespaces (kube-system, monitoring) in cluster defaults
  4. Pin version (enforce-version) for predictable behavior across upgrades
  5. Set cluster-wide baseline as default, then restrict specific namespaces
  6. Combine with Gatekeeper for additional custom policies beyond PSA
  7. Use restricted profile for all production workloads
  8. Document exemptions with clear justification

Recommended Agent Skills

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

mapping-mitre-attack-techniques

Maps observed adversary behaviors, security alerts, and detection rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and sub-techniques to quantify detection coverage and guide control prioritization. Use when building an ATT&CK-based coverage heatmap, tagging SIEM alerts with technique IDs, aligning security controls to adversary playbooks, or reporting threat exposure to executives. Activates for requests involving ATT&CK Navigator, Sigma rules, MITRE D3FEND, or coverage gap analysis.

4,300 470
Explore
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

hunting-for-spearphishing-indicators

Hunt for spearphishing campaign indicators across email logs, endpoint telemetry, and network data to detect targeted email attacks.

4,300 470
Explore
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

analyzing-malicious-url-with-urlscan

URLScan.io is a free service for scanning and analyzing suspicious URLs. It captures screenshots, DOM content, HTTP transactions, JavaScript behavior, and network connections of web pages in an isolat

4,300 470
Explore
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

implementing-zero-standing-privilege-with-cyberark

Deploy CyberArk Secure Cloud Access to eliminate standing privileges in hybrid and multi-cloud environments using just-in-time access with time, entitlement, and approval controls.

4,300 470
Explore
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

implementing-pam-for-database-access

Deploy privileged access management for database systems including Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and MySQL. Covers session proxy configuration, credential vaulting, query auditing, dynamic credentia

4,300 470
Explore
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

detecting-t1003-credential-dumping-with-edr

Detect OS credential dumping techniques targeting LSASS memory, SAM database, NTDS.dit, and cached credentials using EDR telemetry, Sysmon process access monitoring, and Windows security event correlation.

4,300 470
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results