Agent skill
Git Workflow Patterns
Conventional commits, PR practices, branching strategies
Stars
163
Forks
31
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/development/git-workflow-patterns
SKILL.md
Git Workflow Patterns
Modern Git workflows and best practices.
Conventional Commits
Format
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body>
<footer>
Types
feat: New feature
fix: Bug fix
docs: Documentation only
style: Formatting, missing semi-colons, etc
refactor: Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
perf: Performance improvement
test: Adding missing tests
chore: Updating build tasks, package manager configs, etc
ci: Changes to CI configuration
build: Changes to build system or dependencies
revert: Reverting a previous commit
Examples
bash
# Simple
git commit -m "feat: add user authentication"
# With scope
git commit -m "fix(api): handle null user IDs"
# With body
git commit -m "feat: add dark mode
Implements dark mode theme toggle with:
- System preference detection
- Manual override option
- Persisted user choice"
# Breaking change
git commit -m "feat!: redesign API endpoints
BREAKING CHANGE: /api/v1/users is now /api/v2/users"
Branch Naming
feature/add-user-auth
fix/login-redirect-bug
refactor/simplify-api
docs/update-readme
chore/update-dependencies
Pull Request Practices
PR Title
feat: Add user authentication
fix: Resolve login redirect issue
docs: Update API documentation
PR Description Template
markdown
## Summary
Brief description of changes
## Changes
- Change 1
- Change 2
- Change 3
## Testing
- [ ] Unit tests pass
- [ ] Integration tests pass
- [ ] Manual testing completed
## Screenshots
[If UI changes]
## Breaking Changes
[If applicable]
## Related Issues
Closes #123
PR Size Guidelines
✅ Small PR: 50-200 lines (ideal)
⚠️ Medium PR: 200-400 lines (ok)
❌ Large PR: 400+ lines (split if possible)
Code Review
Reviewer Checklist
- Code follows project conventions
- Tests are included and passing
- No obvious bugs or security issues
- Documentation is updated
- PR description is clear
- Commits are logical and well-messaged
Review Comments
✅ Good:
"Consider extracting this into a separate function for better testability"
"This could cause a race condition if called multiple times"
❌ Bad:
"This is wrong"
"Why did you do it this way?"
Branching Strategies
Git Flow
main - Production-ready code
develop - Integration branch for features
feature/* - New features
release/* - Release preparation
hotfix/* - Emergency fixes to production
GitHub Flow (Simpler)
main - Always deployable
feature/* - All work happens in feature branches
- Create PR to merge into main
- Deploy after merge
Useful Commands
Rebase
bash
# Update feature branch with main
git checkout feature/my-feature
git rebase main
# Interactive rebase (clean up commits)
git rebase -i HEAD~3
Stash
bash
# Save work in progress
git stash
# List stashes
git stash list
# Apply stash
git stash pop
Amend Last Commit
bash
git commit --amend
git commit --amend --no-edit
Cherry Pick
bash
git cherry-pick <commit-hash>
Best Practices
✅ Do:
- Write clear commit messages
- Keep commits atomic (one logical change)
- Rebase feature branches before merging
- Review your own PR first
- Keep PRs small and focused
- Write descriptive PR titles
- Link PRs to issues
- Respond to review comments
❌ Don't:
- Commit directly to main
- Create massive PRs
- Use generic commit messages ("fix bug", "update")
- Force push to shared branches
- Merge without review
- Leave unresolved comments
Didn't find tool you were looking for?