Agent skill

frontend-testing

Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests for frontend components, hooks, and utilities. Triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, or write/review test requests.

Stars 193
Forks 28

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/PageAI-Pro/ralph-loop/tree/main/.agent/skills/frontend-testing

SKILL.md

This skill enables Claude to generate high-quality, comprehensive frontend tests following established conventions and best practices.

When to Apply This Skill

Apply this skill when the user:

  • Asks to write tests for a component, hook, or utility
  • Asks to review existing tests for completeness
  • Mentions Vitest, React Testing Library, RTL, or spec files
  • Requests test coverage improvement
  • Mentions testing, unit tests, or integration tests for frontend code
  • Wants to understand testing patterns in the frontend codebase

Do NOT apply when:

  • User is asking about E2E tests (Playwright)
  • User is only asking conceptual questions without code context

Quick Reference

Tech Stack

Tool Version Purpose
Vitest 4+ Test runner
React Testing Library 16+ Component testing
jsdom - Test environment
TypeScript 5+ Type safety

Note: keep this list up to date with the project's dependencies.

Key Commands

Always prefer running specific tests over the entire suite for faster feedback:

bash
# Run ALL tests (avoid during development)
npx vitest run

# ✅ PREFERRED: Run specific file
npx vitest run src/components/Button.spec.tsx

# ✅ PREFERRED: Run tests matching a pattern
npx vitest run --grep "Button"
npx vitest run -t "should render"

# ✅ PREFERRED: Run specific describe block
npx vitest run --grep "Button > Rendering"

# ✅ Run tests in a directory
npx vitest run src/components/

# ✅ Run single test by name
npx vitest run -t "should disable button when loading"

Watch Mode (Background Testing)

Use watch mode for efficient iterative development:

bash
# ✅ Watch mode - reruns on file changes
npx vitest

# ✅ Watch specific file
npx vitest src/components/Button.spec.tsx

# ✅ Watch tests matching pattern
npx vitest --grep "Button"

File Naming

  • Test files: ComponentName.spec.tsx (same directory as component)

Test Structure Template

typescript
import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import Component from './index'

// ✅ Import real project components (DO NOT mock these)
// import Loading from '@/app/components/base/loading'
// import { ChildComponent } from './child-component'

// ✅ Mock external dependencies only
vi.mock('@/service/api')
vi.mock('next/navigation', () => ({
  useRouter: () => ({ push: vi.fn() }),
  usePathname: () => '/test',
}))

// Shared state for mocks (if needed)
let mockSharedState = false

describe('ComponentName', () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    vi.clearAllMocks()  // ✅ Reset mocks BEFORE each test
    mockSharedState = false  // ✅ Reset shared state
  })

  // Rendering tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Rendering', () => {
    it('should render without crashing', () => {
      // Arrange
      const props = { title: 'Test' }

      // Act
      render(<Component {...props} />)

      // Assert
      expect(screen.getByText('Test')).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })

  // Props tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Props', () => {
    it('should apply custom className', () => {
      render(<Component className="custom" />)
      expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('custom')
    })
  })

  // User Interactions
  describe('User Interactions', () => {
    it('should handle click events', () => {
      const handleClick = vi.fn()
      render(<Component onClick={handleClick} />)

      fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))

      expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
    })
  })

  // Edge Cases (REQUIRED)
  describe('Edge Cases', () => {
    it('should handle null data', () => {
      render(<Component data={null} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })

    it('should handle empty array', () => {
      render(<Component items={[]} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/empty/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })
})

Testing Workflow (CRITICAL)

⚠️ Incremental Approach Required

NEVER generate all test files at once. For complex components or multi-file directories:

  1. Analyze & Plan: List all files, order by complexity (simple → complex)
  2. Process ONE at a time: Write test → Run test → Fix if needed → Next
  3. Verify before proceeding: Do NOT continue to next file until current passes
For each file:
  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │ 1. Write test                                  │
  │ 2. Run: npm run test-unit <file>.spec.tsx      │
  │ 3. PASS? → Mark complete, next file            │
  │    FAIL? → Fix first, then continue            │
  └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Complexity-Based Order

Process in this order for multi-file testing:

  1. 🟢 Utility functions (simplest)
  2. 🟢 Custom hooks
  3. 🟡 Simple components (presentational)
  4. 🟡 Medium components (state, effects)
  5. 🔴 Complex components (API, routing)
  6. 🔴 Integration tests (index files - last)

When to Refactor First

  • Medium Complexity: Break into smaller pieces before testing
  • 500+ lines: Consider splitting before testing
  • Many dependencies: Extract logic into hooks first

Testing Strategy

Path-Level Testing (Directory Testing)

When assigned to test a directory/path, test ALL content within that path:

  • Test all components, hooks, utilities in the directory (not just index file)
  • Use incremental approach: one file at a time, verify each before proceeding
  • Goal: 100% coverage of ALL files in the directory

Integration Testing First

Prefer integration testing when writing tests for a directory:

  • Import real project components directly (including base components and siblings)
  • Only mock: API services (@/service/*), next/navigation, complex context providers
  • DO NOT mock base components (@/app/components/base/*)
  • DO NOT mock sibling/child components in the same directory

Core Principles

1. AAA Pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert)

Every test should clearly separate:

  • Arrange: Setup test data and render component
  • Act: Perform user actions
  • Assert: Verify expected outcomes

2. Black-Box Testing

  • Test observable behavior, not implementation details
  • Use semantic queries (getByRole, getByLabelText)
  • Avoid testing internal state directly
  • Prefer pattern matching over hardcoded strings in assertions:
typescript
// ❌ Avoid: hardcoded text assertions
expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()

// ✅ Better: role-based queries
expect(screen.getByRole('status')).toBeInTheDocument()

// ✅ Better: pattern matching
expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument()

3. Single Behavior Per Test

Each test verifies ONE user-observable behavior:

typescript
// ✅ Good: One behavior
it('should disable button when loading', () => {
  render(<Button loading />)
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})

// ❌ Bad: Multiple behaviors
it('should handle loading state', () => {
  render(<Button loading />)
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
  expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('loading')
})

4. Semantic Naming

Use should <behavior> when <condition>:

typescript
it('should show error message when validation fails')
it('should call onSubmit when form is valid')
it('should disable input when isReadOnly is true')

Required Test Scenarios

Always Required (All Components)

  1. Rendering: Component renders without crashing
  2. Props: Required props, optional props, default values
  3. Edge Cases: null, undefined, empty values, boundary conditions

Conditional (When Present)

Feature Test Focus
useState Initial state, transitions, cleanup
useEffect Execution, dependencies, cleanup
Event handlers All onClick, onChange, onSubmit, keyboard
API calls Loading, success, error states
Routing Navigation, params, query strings
useCallback/useMemo Referential equality
Context Provider values, consumer behavior
Forms Validation, submission, error display

Coverage Goals (Per File)

For each test file generated, aim for:

  • 100% function coverage
  • 100% statement coverage
  • >95% branch coverage
  • >95% line coverage

Note: For multi-file directories, process one file at a time with full coverage each. See references/workflow.md.

Detailed Guides

For more detailed information, refer to:

  • references/workflow.md - Incremental testing workflow (MUST READ for multi-file testing)
  • references/mocking.md - Mock patterns and best practices
  • references/async-testing.md - Async operations and API calls
  • references/common-patterns.md - Frequently used testing patterns
  • references/checklist.md - Test generation checklist and validation steps

Project Configuration

  • vitest.config.ts - Vitest configuration
  • vitest.setup.ts - Test environment setup
  • Modules are not mocked automatically. Global mocks live in vitest.setup.ts (for example react-i18next, next/image); mock other modules like ky or mime locally in test files.

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

PageAI-Pro/ralph-loop

vercel-react-best-practices

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

193 28
Explore
PageAI-Pro/ralph-loop

frontend-code-review

Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.

193 28
Explore
PageAI-Pro/ralph-loop

component-refactoring

Refactor high-complexity React components in frontend. Use when the user asks for code splitting, hook extraction, or complexity reduction, or when you come across a component that is too complex to understand and refactor it.

193 28
Explore
PageAI-Pro/ralph-loop

postgres

PostgreSQL best practices, query optimization, connection troubleshooting, and performance improvement. Load when working with Postgres databases.

193 28
Explore
PageAI-Pro/ralph-loop

mysql

Plan and review MySQL/InnoDB schema, indexing, query tuning, transactions, and operations. Use when creating or modifying MySQL tables, indexes, or queries; diagnosing slow/locking behavior; planning migrations; or troubleshooting replication and connection issues. Load when using a MySQL database.

193 28
Explore
PageAI-Pro/ralph-loop

web-design-guidelines

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".

193 28
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results