Agent skill

evaluating-code-models

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

Stars 23,776
Forks 2,298

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/tree/main/cli-tool/components/skills/ai-research/evaluation-bigcode-evaluation-harness

SKILL.md

BigCode Evaluation Harness - Code Model Benchmarking

Quick Start

BigCode Evaluation Harness evaluates code generation models across 15+ benchmarks including HumanEval, MBPP, and MultiPL-E (18 languages).

Installation:

bash
git clone https://github.com/bigcode-project/bigcode-evaluation-harness.git
cd bigcode-evaluation-harness
pip install -e .
accelerate config

Evaluate on HumanEval:

bash
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --temperature 0.2 \
  --n_samples 20 \
  --batch_size 10 \
  --allow_code_execution \
  --save_generations

View available tasks:

bash
python -c "from bigcode_eval.tasks import ALL_TASKS; print(ALL_TASKS)"

Common Workflows

Workflow 1: Standard Code Benchmark Evaluation

Evaluate model on core code benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP, HumanEval+).

Checklist:

Code Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model and generation
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation with code execution
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze pass@k results

Step 1: Choose benchmark suite

Python code generation (most common):

  • HumanEval: 164 handwritten problems, function completion
  • HumanEval+: Same 164 problems with 80× more tests (stricter)
  • MBPP: 500 crowd-sourced problems, entry-level difficulty
  • MBPP+: 399 curated problems with 35× more tests

Multi-language (18 languages):

  • MultiPL-E: HumanEval/MBPP translated to C++, Java, JavaScript, Go, Rust, etc.

Advanced:

  • APPS: 10,000 problems (introductory/interview/competition)
  • DS-1000: 1,000 data science problems across 7 libraries

Step 2: Configure model and generation

bash
# Standard HuggingFace model
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --temperature 0.2 \
  --do_sample True \
  --n_samples 200 \
  --batch_size 50 \
  --allow_code_execution

# Quantized model (4-bit)
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model codellama/CodeLlama-34b-hf \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --load_in_4bit \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --allow_code_execution

# Custom/private model
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model /path/to/my-code-model \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --trust_remote_code \
  --use_auth_token \
  --allow_code_execution

Step 3: Run evaluation

bash
# Full evaluation with pass@k estimation (k=1,10,100)
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --temperature 0.8 \
  --n_samples 200 \
  --batch_size 50 \
  --allow_code_execution \
  --save_generations \
  --metric_output_path results/starcoder2-humaneval.json

Step 4: Analyze results

Results in results/starcoder2-humaneval.json:

json
{
  "humaneval": {
    "pass@1": 0.354,
    "pass@10": 0.521,
    "pass@100": 0.689
  },
  "config": {
    "model": "bigcode/starcoder2-7b",
    "temperature": 0.8,
    "n_samples": 200
  }
}

Workflow 2: Multi-Language Evaluation (MultiPL-E)

Evaluate code generation across 18 programming languages.

Checklist:

Multi-Language Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Generate solutions (host machine)
- [ ] Step 2: Run evaluation in Docker (safe execution)
- [ ] Step 3: Compare across languages

Step 1: Generate solutions on host

bash
# Generate without execution (safe)
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks multiple-py,multiple-js,multiple-java,multiple-cpp \
  --max_length_generation 650 \
  --temperature 0.8 \
  --n_samples 50 \
  --batch_size 50 \
  --generation_only \
  --save_generations \
  --save_generations_path generations_multi.json

Step 2: Evaluate in Docker container

bash
# Pull the MultiPL-E Docker image
docker pull ghcr.io/bigcode-project/evaluation-harness-multiple

# Run evaluation inside container
docker run -v $(pwd)/generations_multi.json:/app/generations.json:ro \
  -it evaluation-harness-multiple python3 main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks multiple-py,multiple-js,multiple-java,multiple-cpp \
  --load_generations_path /app/generations.json \
  --allow_code_execution \
  --n_samples 50

Supported languages: Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, TypeScript, C#, PHP, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, Scala, Perl, Julia, Lua, R, Racket

Workflow 3: Instruction-Tuned Model Evaluation

Evaluate chat/instruction models with proper formatting.

Checklist:

Instruction Model Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Use instruction-tuned tasks
- [ ] Step 2: Configure instruction tokens
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation

Step 1: Choose instruction tasks

  • instruct-humaneval: HumanEval with instruction prompts
  • humanevalsynthesize-{lang}: HumanEvalPack synthesis tasks

Step 2: Configure instruction tokens

bash
# For models with chat templates (e.g., CodeLlama-Instruct)
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model codellama/CodeLlama-7b-Instruct-hf \
  --tasks instruct-humaneval \
  --instruction_tokens "<s>[INST],</s>,[/INST]" \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --allow_code_execution

Step 3: HumanEvalPack for instruction models

bash
# Test code synthesis across 6 languages
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model codellama/CodeLlama-7b-Instruct-hf \
  --tasks humanevalsynthesize-python,humanevalsynthesize-js \
  --prompt instruct \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --allow_code_execution

Workflow 4: Compare Multiple Models

Benchmark suite for model comparison.

Step 1: Create evaluation script

bash
#!/bin/bash
# eval_models.sh

MODELS=(
  "bigcode/starcoder2-7b"
  "codellama/CodeLlama-7b-hf"
  "deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-6.7b-base"
)
TASKS="humaneval,mbpp"

for model in "${MODELS[@]}"; do
  model_name=$(echo $model | tr '/' '-')
  echo "Evaluating $model"

  accelerate launch main.py \
    --model $model \
    --tasks $TASKS \
    --temperature 0.2 \
    --n_samples 20 \
    --batch_size 20 \
    --allow_code_execution \
    --metric_output_path results/${model_name}.json
done

Step 2: Generate comparison table

python
import json
import pandas as pd

models = ["bigcode-starcoder2-7b", "codellama-CodeLlama-7b-hf", "deepseek-ai-deepseek-coder-6.7b-base"]
results = []

for model in models:
    with open(f"results/{model}.json") as f:
        data = json.load(f)
        results.append({
            "Model": model,
            "HumanEval pass@1": f"{data['humaneval']['pass@1']:.3f}",
            "MBPP pass@1": f"{data['mbpp']['pass@1']:.3f}"
        })

df = pd.DataFrame(results)
print(df.to_markdown(index=False))

When to Use vs Alternatives

Use BigCode Evaluation Harness when:

  • Evaluating code generation models specifically
  • Need multi-language evaluation (18 languages via MultiPL-E)
  • Testing functional correctness with unit tests (pass@k)
  • Benchmarking for BigCode/HuggingFace leaderboards
  • Evaluating fill-in-the-middle (FIM) capabilities

Use alternatives instead:

  • lm-evaluation-harness: General LLM benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HellaSwag)
  • EvalPlus: Stricter HumanEval+/MBPP+ with more test cases
  • SWE-bench: Real-world GitHub issue resolution
  • LiveCodeBench: Contamination-free, continuously updated problems
  • CodeXGLUE: Code understanding tasks (clone detection, defect prediction)

Supported Benchmarks

Benchmark Problems Languages Metric Use Case
HumanEval 164 Python pass@k Standard code completion
HumanEval+ 164 Python pass@k Stricter evaluation (80× tests)
MBPP 500 Python pass@k Entry-level problems
MBPP+ 399 Python pass@k Stricter evaluation (35× tests)
MultiPL-E 164×18 18 languages pass@k Multi-language evaluation
APPS 10,000 Python pass@k Competition-level
DS-1000 1,000 Python pass@k Data science (pandas, numpy, etc.)
HumanEvalPack 164×3×6 6 languages pass@k Synthesis/fix/explain
Mercury 1,889 Python Efficiency Computational efficiency

Common Issues

Issue: Different results than reported in papers

Check these factors:

bash
# 1. Verify n_samples (need 200 for accurate pass@k)
--n_samples 200

# 2. Check temperature (0.2 for greedy-ish, 0.8 for sampling)
--temperature 0.8

# 3. Verify task name matches exactly
--tasks humaneval  # Not "human_eval" or "HumanEval"

# 4. Check max_length_generation
--max_length_generation 512  # Increase for longer problems

Issue: CUDA out of memory

bash
# Use quantization
--load_in_8bit
# OR
--load_in_4bit

# Reduce batch size
--batch_size 1

# Set memory limit
--max_memory_per_gpu "20GiB"

Issue: Code execution hangs or times out

Use Docker for safe execution:

bash
# Generate on host (no execution)
--generation_only --save_generations

# Evaluate in Docker
docker run ... --allow_code_execution --load_generations_path ...

Issue: Low scores on instruction models

Ensure proper instruction formatting:

bash
# Use instruction-specific tasks
--tasks instruct-humaneval

# Set instruction tokens for your model
--instruction_tokens "<s>[INST],</s>,[/INST]"

Issue: MultiPL-E language failures

Use the dedicated Docker image:

bash
docker pull ghcr.io/bigcode-project/evaluation-harness-multiple

Command Reference

Argument Default Description
--model - HuggingFace model ID or local path
--tasks - Comma-separated task names
--n_samples 1 Samples per problem (200 for pass@k)
--temperature 0.2 Sampling temperature
--max_length_generation 512 Max tokens (prompt + generation)
--batch_size 1 Batch size per GPU
--allow_code_execution False Enable code execution (required)
--generation_only False Generate without evaluation
--load_generations_path - Load pre-generated solutions
--save_generations False Save generated code
--metric_output_path results.json Output file for metrics
--load_in_8bit False 8-bit quantization
--load_in_4bit False 4-bit quantization
--trust_remote_code False Allow custom model code
--precision fp32 Model precision (fp32/fp16/bf16)

Hardware Requirements

Model Size VRAM (fp16) VRAM (4-bit) Time (HumanEval, n=200)
7B 14GB 6GB ~30 min (A100)
13B 26GB 10GB ~1 hour (A100)
34B 68GB 20GB ~2 hours (A100)

Resources

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

davila7/claude-code-templates

verl-rl-training

Provides guidance for training LLMs with reinforcement learning using verl (Volcano Engine RL). Use when implementing RLHF, GRPO, PPO, or other RL algorithms for LLM post-training at scale with flexible infrastructure backends.

23,776 2,298
Explore
davila7/claude-code-templates

openrlhf-training

High-performance RLHF framework with Ray+vLLM acceleration. Use for PPO, GRPO, RLOO, DPO training of large models (7B-70B+). Built on Ray, vLLM, ZeRO-3. 2× faster than DeepSpeedChat with distributed architecture and GPU resource sharing.

23,776 2,298
Explore
davila7/claude-code-templates

gguf-quantization

GGUF format and llama.cpp quantization for efficient CPU/GPU inference. Use when deploying models on consumer hardware, Apple Silicon, or when needing flexible quantization from 2-8 bit without GPU requirements.

23,776 2,298
Explore
davila7/claude-code-templates

Claude Code Guide

Master guide for using Claude Code effectively. Includes configuration templates, prompting strategies "Thinking" keywords, debugging techniques, and best practices for interacting with the agent.

23,776 2,298
Explore
davila7/claude-code-templates

qdrant-vector-search

High-performance vector similarity search engine for RAG and semantic search. Use when building production RAG systems requiring fast nearest neighbor search, hybrid search with filtering, or scalable vector storage with Rust-powered performance.

23,776 2,298
Explore
davila7/claude-code-templates

behavioral-modes

AI operational modes (brainstorm, implement, debug, review, teach, ship, orchestrate). Use to adapt behavior based on task type.

23,776 2,298
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results