Agent skill

dry-refactor

This skill should be used when the user asks to "refactor duplicate code", "apply DRY principles", "eliminate code repetition", "extract common functionality", or mentions code duplication, similar patterns, repeated logic, or reusable abstractions.

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/development/dry-refactor

SKILL.md

DRY Refactoring

Process

  1. Identify - Exact copies, similar patterns, parallel hierarchies, naming patterns (data1/data2, handleXClick)
  2. Analyze - Coupling, cohesion, frequency (Rule of Three: wait for 3+ occurrences), volatility
  3. Refactor - Choose technique below, extract incrementally, test after each step

Techniques

Extract Function - Same logic in multiple places

ts
getFullName(user: User) => `${user.firstName} ${user.lastName}`

Extract Variable - Repeated expression

ts
const isWorkingAge = user.age >= 18 && user.age < 65;

Parameterize - Code differs only in values

ts
validateField(value: string, pattern: RegExp)
// Use: validateField(email, EMAIL_REGEX)

Extract Class - Related functions scattered

ts
class UserRewards {
  calculateDiscount(user, amount) { }
  getLoyaltyPoints(user) { }
}

Polymorphism - Repeated switch/if-else

ts
interface PaymentProcessor { process(amount: number): void }
class CreditProcessor implements PaymentProcessor { }

Strategy Pattern - Duplicated algorithm selection

ts
const strategies = { date: byDate, name: byName };
items.sort(strategies[sortType] ?? byPriority);

Pull Up Method - Identical methods in subclasses

ts
class BaseUser { getDisplayName() { } }
class AdminUser extends BaseUser { }

Detection

Code Smells: Look for numbered variables (data1, data2), parallel function names (handleXClick), near-identical code differing only in constants, repeated validation/error handling, parallel class structures, large switches in multiple places, repeated null checks, magic numbers

Rule of Three: Wait for 3+ occurrences before abstracting

When NOT to DRY

  • Coincidental similarity - Avoid abstracting different domains/business rules that happen to look alike (will diverge)
  • Premature abstraction - Wait until pattern is clear; early abstraction often guesses wrong
  • Single use - Skip abstraction when code appears 1-2 times and is unlikely to grow
  • Test clarity - Prefer readable test setup over DRY
  • Over-engineering - Avoid abstracting every 2-3 line similarity

Patterns

  • Configuration over code - Use data structures to eliminate conditionals
  • Template Method - Define skeleton in base, vary steps in subclasses
  • Dependency Injection - Parameterize dependencies to reduce coupling
  • Builder - Construct complex objects incrementally

Best Practices

  • Refactor only after tests pass (green)
  • Apply one refactoring at a time
  • Commit changes frequently
  • Name abstractions for intent, not implementation
  • Consider performance impact of abstractions
  • Review abstractions with team before finalizing

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results