Agent skill

cpo-advisor

Strategic product leadership for scaling companies. Covers product vision, portfolio strategy, product-market fit measurement, product org design, north star metrics, investment postures, and board-level product reporting. Not for feature-level work -- for the decisions that determine what gets built, why, and by whom. Use when setting product vision, managing a product portfolio, measuring PMF, designing product teams, prioritizing at portfolio level, or when user mentions CPO, product strategy, PMF, product organization, portfolio prioritization, roadmap strategy, north star metric, or product-led growth.

Stars 71
Forks 21

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/cpo-advisor

Metadata

Additional technical details for this skill

author
borghei
domain
cpo-leadership
updated
1773014400
version
2.0.0
category
c-level
triggers
[
    "CPO",
    "chief product officer",
    "product strategy",
    "product vision",
    "product-market fit",
    "PMF",
    "portfolio management",
    "product organization",
    "roadmap strategy",
    "product metrics",
    "north star metric",
    "retention curve",
    "product trio",
    "team topologies",
    "JTBD",
    "jobs to be done",
    "product-led growth",
    "PLG",
    "product board reporting",
    "invest maintain kill",
    "feature prioritization",
    "product portfolio"
]
frameworks
[
    "pmf-playbook",
    "product-strategy",
    "product-org-design",
    "portfolio-management",
    "north-star-framework",
    "investment-posture"
]

SKILL.md

CPO Advisor

Strategic product leadership. Vision, portfolio, PMF, org design, and metrics. Not for feature-level work -- for the decisions that determine what gets built, why, and by whom.

Keywords

CPO, chief product officer, product strategy, product vision, product-market fit, PMF, portfolio management, product org, roadmap strategy, product metrics, north star metric, retention curve, product trio, team topologies, jobs to be done, JTBD, category design, product positioning, board product reporting, invest-maintain-kill, BCG matrix, switching costs, network effects, product-led growth, PLG, feature adoption, time to value, activation rate


The CPO Owns Three Things

Everything else is delegation.

Ownership What It Means Key Question
Portfolio Which products exist, which get investment, which get killed "If we could only fund 2 of our 4 products, which 2?"
Vision Where the product goes in 3-5 years and why customers care "What does the world look like if we succeed?"
Organization The team structure that can execute the vision "Can this org ship the next 12 months of strategy?"

Product-Market Fit Assessment

PMF Scoring Matrix

Dimension Weight Score 1-3 (Weak) Score 4-6 (Emerging) Score 7-10 (Strong)
Retention 30% D30 < 15% (consumer) or < 40% (B2B) D30 15-30% / 40-60% D30 > 30% / > 60%
Engagement 25% DAU/MAU < 15% DAU/MAU 15-35% DAU/MAU > 35%
Satisfaction 25% Sean Ellis < 25% "very disappointed" 25-40% > 40%
Growth 20% No organic growth Some organic, mostly paid > 50% organic

PMF Decision Tree

START: "Do we have PMF?"
  |
  v
[Check retention curve shape]
  |
  +-- Declining to zero --> NO PMF. Stop building. Talk to users.
  |
  +-- Declining but flattening --> EMERGING. Find the segment where it's flat.
  |
  +-- Flat or smiling --> [Check Sean Ellis score]
                          |
                          +-- < 25% "very disappointed" --> Weak PMF. Product is nice, not essential.
                          |
                          +-- 25-40% --> Moderate PMF. Find and double down on power users.
                          |
                          +-- > 40% --> [Check organic growth]
                                        |
                                        +-- < 30% organic --> PMF exists but distribution is weak.
                                        +-- > 30% organic --> STRONG PMF. Scale.

Post-PMF Traps

Trap Description Prevention
Feature creep Adding features for new segments dilutes core value Maintain a "jobs" focus, not feature focus
Premature scaling Scaling sales/marketing before retention proves sustainable Prove 3+ cohorts retain before scaling spend
Metric vanity Celebrating signups while ignoring retention North star must be a retention/engagement metric
Founder departure from product CEO stops talking to customers post-PMF Monthly customer conversations are permanent
Platform too early Building platform capabilities before core is solid Platform only after 3+ products need shared infra

Portfolio Management

Investment Posture Framework

Every product gets exactly one posture. "Wait and see" is a decision to lose share.

Posture Signal Resource Allocation Review Cadence
Invest High growth, strong/improving retention, clear PMF Full team, aggressive roadmap, dedicated marketing Monthly
Maintain Stable revenue, slow growth, good margins Bug fixes, incremental improvement, minimal new features Quarterly
Harvest Declining growth, still profitable, no recovery path Minimal investment, maximize cash extraction Quarterly
Kill Declining, negative margins, no recovery evidence Set sunset date, migration plan, team reallocation Immediate

Portfolio Health Scorecard

Metric Healthy Unhealthy
% revenue from "Invest" products > 60% < 40%
% engineering on "Kill" candidates < 10% > 20%
Number of products without clear posture 0 > 1
Portfolio D30 retention (weighted) Improving QoQ Declining QoQ
# of "question marks" > 2 quarters 0 > 2

Portfolio Review Process

Quarterly Portfolio Review (Half-day workshop)

Step 1: Data Preparation (pre-meeting)
  - Revenue, growth rate, retention, margin per product
  - Engineering investment % per product
  - Customer satisfaction per product

Step 2: BCG Classification
  - Plot each product on Growth Rate (Y) vs Market Share (X)
  - Stars: high growth, high share --> Invest
  - Cash Cows: low growth, high share --> Maintain/Harvest
  - Question Marks: high growth, low share --> Invest or Kill (decide now)
  - Dogs: low growth, low share --> Kill

Step 3: Investment Allocation
  - Align engineering capacity to posture
  - Reallocate from Kill/Harvest to Invest
  - Set clear milestones for Question Marks (90-day decision point)

Step 4: Communication
  - Share portfolio decisions with all product teams
  - Update roadmaps to reflect postures
  - Communicate sunset plans for Kill products

North Star Metric Framework

Selection Criteria

The north star metric must satisfy ALL of these:

Criterion Test
Measures customer value Does improvement mean customers got more value?
Leading indicator Does it predict future revenue?
Actionable Can product teams influence it?
Single number Can you state it as one metric?
Non-gameable Is it hard to improve without genuinely helping customers?

North Star by Business Model

Model North Star Why It Works
B2B SaaS Weekly active accounts using core feature Combines adoption + engagement + stickiness
Consumer social Daily content creators Creators drive consumer engagement
Marketplace Successful transactions per week Both sides active = healthy marketplace
PLG Accounts reaching activation within 14 days Activation predicts retention
Data/Analytics Queries per active user per week Usage intensity = value received
Fintech Monthly active transactors Transaction activity = core value
E-commerce Repeat purchase rate (90-day) Retention is everything in commerce

Metrics Hierarchy

North Star Metric (1, owned by CPO)
  |
  +-- Leading Indicator 1 (owned by PM Team A)
  |     e.g., Activation rate within 7 days
  |
  +-- Leading Indicator 2 (owned by PM Team B)
  |     e.g., Feature X adoption rate
  |
  +-- Leading Indicator 3 (owned by PM Team C)
  |     e.g., D7 retention rate
  |
  +-- Guard Rail Metrics (owned by CPO)
        e.g., NPS, support ticket volume, revenue per user

Product Organization Design

Team Topology Selection

Topology When to Use Optimal Size Communication
Stream-aligned Default. Teams own end-to-end customer journey. 5-9 people Low cross-team dependency
Platform Shared infrastructure multiple streams need 4-8 people API-first, self-service
Enabling Temporary teams to upskill stream teams 2-4 people Coaching mode, time-limited
Complicated subsystem Deep specialist domain (ML, payments) 3-6 people Provides service to streams

Product Team Ratios

Company Size PM : Engineers PM : Designer Total Product Team
10-30 1:4-6 1:1 1 PM, 1 Designer, 4-6 Eng
30-80 1:5-8 1:1-2 2-4 PMs, 2-3 Designers
80-200 1:6-10 1:1-2 5-10 PMs, 4-6 Designers
200+ 1:8-12 1:2 10+ PMs, 8+ Designers

The Product Trio

Every product team should operate as a trio: PM + Designer + Tech Lead.

Role Owns Decides
PM What to build and why Prioritization, scope
Designer User experience and usability Interaction patterns, research
Tech Lead How to build and technical feasibility Architecture, implementation

Anti-pattern: PM writes spec, hands to design, design hands to engineering. This is waterfall with agile labels.


CPO Dashboard

Category Metric Frequency Target
Growth North star metric Weekly Improving MoM
Retention D30 / D90 retention by cohort Weekly Flattening or improving
Acquisition New activations Weekly Per plan
Activation Time to first value Weekly Decreasing
Engagement DAU/MAU ratio Weekly > 30% (B2B) / > 20% (consumer)
Satisfaction NPS trend Monthly > 40
Portfolio Revenue per product Monthly Aligned to posture
Portfolio Engineering investment % per product Monthly Aligned to posture
Quality Support tickets per 1K users Monthly Decreasing
Moat Feature adoption depth Monthly Increasing

Red Flags

  • Products stuck as "question marks" for 2+ quarters without a decision -- make the call
  • Engineering allocated to highest-revenue product while highest-growth product is understaffed -- misallocation
  • 30% of team time on products with declining revenue -- sunk cost fallacy

  • Retention curve never flattens -- no PMF, stop building features and start talking to users
  • PMs writing specs without talking to users -- product theater
  • Platform team has 6-week queue -- platform should be self-service, not a bottleneck
  • CPO has not talked to a customer in 30+ days -- disconnected from reality
  • North star trending up while retention trends down -- wrong metric
  • Roadmap built from sales requests instead of user data -- sales-driven product is a trap
  • No user research conducted in 90+ days -- team is guessing, not learning

Integration with C-Suite

When... CPO Works With... To...
Company direction CEO (ceo-advisor) Translate vision into product bets
Roadmap funding CFO (cfo-advisor) Justify investment allocation per product
Scaling product org COO + CHRO Align hiring with product growth needs
Technical feasibility CTO (cto-advisor) Co-own features vs. platform trade-off
Launch timing CMO (cmo-advisor) Align releases with demand gen capacity
Sales-requested features CRO (cro-advisor) Separate revenue-critical from noise
Compliance deadlines CISO (ciso-advisor) Identify non-negotiable security items
Product strategy Product Team (product-team/) Execute strategy through product managers
User research UX Research (product-team/ux-researcher) Validate assumptions with data

Proactive Triggers

  • Retention curve not flattening -- PMF at risk, stop feature work and investigate
  • Feature requests piling up without prioritization framework -- propose RICE scoring
  • No user research in 90+ days -- product team is building on assumptions
  • NPS declining QoQ -- dig into detractor feedback, find the pattern
  • Portfolio has a "dog" everyone avoids discussing -- force the kill/invest decision
  • Engineering spending > 20% on a product with < 5% of revenue -- investment misalignment
  • New competitor launched with similar positioning -- competitive response needed

Output Artifacts

Request Deliverable
"Do we have PMF?" PMF scorecard across 4 dimensions with cohort data
"Prioritize our roadmap" Scored backlog with framework (RICE/ICE), stack-ranked
"Evaluate our portfolio" BCG map with invest/maintain/kill recommendations per product
"Design our product org" Org proposal with topology, ratios, reporting, and transition plan
"Product board section" Board slide: north star, retention, roadmap highlights, risks
"Set our north star" North star proposal with hierarchy, leading indicators, and guard rails
"Kill a product" Sunset plan: timeline, migration, communication, team reallocation

Tool Reference

1. product_portfolio_analyzer.py

Analyzes a product portfolio using BCG matrix classification (Star/Cash Cow/Question Mark/Dog), calculates portfolio health scores, identifies investment misalignment, and generates rebalancing recommendations.

bash
python scripts/product_portfolio_analyzer.py --input portfolio.json --json
python scripts/product_portfolio_analyzer.py --input portfolio.json
Flag Type Description
--input required Path to JSON file with products (revenue, growth rate, market share, engineering investment %, retention)
--json optional Output in JSON format instead of human-readable text

2. feature_prioritizer.py

Prioritizes features using RICE scoring (Reach x Impact x Confidence / Effort). Supports custom weights, generates stack-ranked backlogs, and flags scoring anomalies.

bash
python scripts/feature_prioritizer.py --input features.json --json
python scripts/feature_prioritizer.py --input features.json --method rice
Flag Type Description
--input required Path to JSON file with features (reach, impact, confidence, effort, optional category)
--method optional Scoring method: rice (default), ice, or weighted
--json optional Output in JSON format instead of human-readable text

3. product_health_scorer.py

Scores product health across 5 dimensions: retention (D30/D90), engagement (DAU/MAU), satisfaction (NPS/Sean Ellis), growth (organic %), and activation (time to value). Generates PMF assessment and trend analysis.

bash
python scripts/product_health_scorer.py --input product_data.json --json
python scripts/product_health_scorer.py --input product_data.json
Flag Type Description
--input required Path to JSON file with product metrics across retention, engagement, satisfaction, growth, and activation
--json optional Output in JSON format instead of human-readable text

Troubleshooting

Problem Likely Cause Resolution
Products stuck as "question marks" for 2+ quarters No decision framework or leadership avoidance Force invest-or-kill decision at next portfolio review; set 90-day milestones with automatic kill trigger
Engineering allocated to highest-revenue product while highest-growth product starves Investment posture not aligned to growth potential Run portfolio analyzer to quantify misalignment; reallocate using BCG classification
RICE scores gamed by PMs inflating reach or impact No calibration process or shared scoring standards Require evidence for each score dimension; run quarterly calibration sessions across PM teams
North star metric trending up while retention trends down Wrong north star metric selected or metric is gameable Re-evaluate north star against the 5 selection criteria; add retention as a guard rail metric
Roadmap built from sales requests instead of user data No structured intake process or CPO not filtering Implement feature request triage; require user research evidence before roadmap inclusion
Platform team has 6-week queue blocking stream teams Platform not self-service; too many dependencies Redesign platform for self-service APIs; add enabling team to unblock highest-priority streams
No user research conducted in 90+ days Research not embedded in team workflow or understaffed Embed researcher in product trio; set minimum research cadence (2 studies per quarter minimum)

Success Criteria

  • Every product has a clear investment posture (Invest/Maintain/Harvest/Kill) reviewed quarterly
  • North star metric improving month-over-month for "Invest" products
  • D30 retention flattening or improving for all active products
  • Engineering investment percentage aligned to portfolio posture within 10% tolerance
  • Feature prioritization uses a consistent scoring framework across all PM teams
  • Time to first value decreasing quarter-over-quarter
  • No product classified as "question mark" for more than 2 consecutive quarters

Scope & Limitations

In scope: Product-market fit assessment, portfolio management (BCG classification, investment postures), north star metric framework, product organization design (team topologies, ratios, product trio), feature prioritization (RICE/ICE scoring), product health scoring, CPO dashboard metrics, and board-level product reporting.

Out of scope: Feature-level product management (use product-team/product-strategist), UX design and research execution (use product-team/ux-researcher), engineering implementation planning (use engineering/ skills), pricing strategy (use cro-advisor pricing section), and customer success management. Tools analyze product metrics snapshots; continuous product analytics requires integration with analytics platforms.

Limitations: PMF scoring depends on cohort-level retention data that early-stage products may not have. BCG classification requires market share estimates that are inherently imprecise. RICE scoring is subjective; quality depends on calibration rigor. Product health benchmarks vary significantly by business model (B2B vs consumer, SaaS vs marketplace).


Integration Points

  • ceo-advisor -- Product strategy translates CEO vision into product bets; portfolio health feeds board reporting
  • cto-advisor -- Technical feasibility co-owned; features vs platform trade-off decisions require CTO partnership
  • cro-advisor -- Sales-requested features filtered through CPO; expansion revenue depends on product roadmap
  • cmo-advisor -- Launch timing aligned with demand gen capacity; product positioning informs marketing
  • cfo-advisor -- Investment allocation per product justified with portfolio health data
  • product-team/ -- CPO strategy executed through product managers; research and prioritization cascade down

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

borghei/Claude-Skills

churn-prevention

SaaS churn reduction covering cancel flow design, dynamic save offers, exit survey architecture, dunning sequences, payment recovery, win-back campaigns, and churn impact modeling.

71 21
Explore
borghei/Claude-Skills

popup-cro

Popup and modal optimization for conversion. Covers exit-intent, slide-ins, banners, timing optimization, frequency capping, audience targeting, compliance, and A/B testing frameworks for lead capture, promotions, and announcements.

71 21
Explore
borghei/Claude-Skills

competitor-alternatives

Competitor comparison and alternative page creation for SEO and sales enablement. Covers 4 page formats (singular alternative, plural alternatives, vs pages, competitor vs competitor), content architecture, research methodology, and centralized competitor data management.

71 21
Explore
borghei/Claude-Skills

contract-and-proposal-writer

Generate production-ready business documents including freelance contracts, project proposals, SOWs, NDAs, and MSAs with jurisdiction-aware clauses. Covers US (Delaware), EU (GDPR), UK, and DACH (German law) legal frameworks. Includes contract templates, clause libraries, and DOCX conversion. Use when starting client engagements, writing proposals, drafting partnership agreements, or needing GDPR-compliant data processing addenda.

71 21
Explore
borghei/Claude-Skills

pricing-strategy

SaaS pricing design and optimization covering value metric selection, tier architecture, price point research, pricing page design, price increase execution, and competitive pricing analysis.

71 21
Explore
borghei/Claude-Skills

referral-program

Referral and affiliate program design covering referral loop architecture, incentive design, trigger moment optimization, viral coefficient modeling, affiliate program structure, and optimization playbook.

71 21
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results