Agent skill
competitor-teardown
Structured competitive analysis with feature matrices, SWOT, positioning maps, and UX review. Covers research frameworks, pricing comparison, review mining, and visual deliverables. Use for: market research, competitive intelligence, investor decks, product strategy, sales enablement. Triggers: competitor analysis, competitive analysis, competitor teardown, market research, competitive intelligence, swot analysis, competitor comparison, market landscape, competitor review, competitive landscape, feature comparison, market positioning
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/inference-sh/skills/tree/main/guides/product/competitor-teardown
SKILL.md
Competitor Teardown
Structured competitive analysis with research and screenshots via inference.sh CLI.
Quick Start
Requires inference.sh CLI (
infsh). Install instructions
infsh login
# Research competitor landscape
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
"query": "top project management tools comparison 2024 market share"
}'
# Screenshot competitor's website
infsh app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
"url": "https://competitor.com",
"action": "screenshot"
}'
Teardown Framework
The 7-Layer Analysis
| Layer | What to Analyze | Data Source |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Product | Features, UX, quality | Screenshots, free trial |
| 2. Pricing | Plans, pricing model, hidden costs | Pricing page, sales call |
| 3. Positioning | Messaging, tagline, ICP | Website, ads |
| 4. Traction | Users, revenue, growth | Web search, press, funding |
| 5. Reviews | Strengths, weaknesses from users | G2, Capterra, App Store |
| 6. Content | Blog, social, SEO strategy | Website, social profiles |
| 7. Team | Size, key hires, background | LinkedIn, About page |
Research Commands
Company Overview
# General intelligence
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
"query": "CompetitorX company overview funding team size 2024"
}'
# Funding and financials
infsh app run exa/search --input '{
"query": "CompetitorX funding round series valuation investors"
}'
# Recent news
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
"query": "CompetitorX latest news announcements 2024"
}'
Product Analysis
# Feature comparison
infsh app run exa/search --input '{
"query": "CompetitorX vs alternatives feature comparison review"
}'
# Pricing details
infsh app run tavily/extract --input '{
"urls": ["https://competitor.com/pricing"]
}'
# User reviews
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
"query": "CompetitorX reviews G2 Capterra pros cons 2024"
}'
UX Screenshots
# Homepage
infsh app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
"url": "https://competitor.com",
"action": "screenshot"
}'
# Pricing page
infsh app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
"url": "https://competitor.com/pricing",
"action": "screenshot"
}'
# Signup flow
infsh app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
"url": "https://competitor.com/signup",
"action": "screenshot"
}'
Feature Matrix
Structure
| Feature | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Real-time collaboration | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| API access | ✅ | Paid only | ✅ | ❌ |
| SSO/SAML | ✅ | Enterprise | ✅ | Enterprise |
| Custom reports | ✅ | Limited | ✅ | ❌ |
| Mobile app | ✅ | iOS only | ✅ | ✅ |
| Free tier | ✅ (unlimited) | ✅ (3 users) | ❌ | ✅ (1 project) |
| Integrations | 50+ | 100+ | 30+ | 20+ |
Rules
- ✅ = Full support
- ⚠️ or "Partial" = Limited or conditional
- ❌ = Not available
- Note conditions: "Paid only", "Enterprise tier", "Beta"
- Lead with features where YOU win
- Be honest about competitor strengths — credibility matters
Pricing Comparison
Structure
| | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|---------|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| **Free tier** | Yes, 5 users | Yes, 3 users | No |
| **Starter** | $10/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $12/user/mo |
| **Pro** | $25/user/mo | $30/user/mo | $29/user/mo |
| **Enterprise** | Custom | Custom | $50/user/mo |
| **Billing** | Monthly/Annual | Annual only | Monthly/Annual |
| **Annual discount** | 20% | 15% | 25% |
| **Min seats** | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| **Hidden costs** | None | Setup fee $500 | API calls metered |
What to Look For
- Minimum seat requirements
- Annual-only billing (reduces flexibility)
- Feature gating between tiers
- Overage charges
- Setup/onboarding fees
- Contract lock-in periods
SWOT Analysis
Create a SWOT for each competitor:
### Competitor A — SWOT
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|-----------|------------|
| • Strong brand recognition | • Slow feature development |
| • Large integration ecosystem | • Complex onboarding (30+ min) |
| • Enterprise sales team | • No free tier |
| Opportunities | Threats |
|--------------|---------|
| • AI features not yet shipped | • New AI-native competitors |
| • Expanding into mid-market | • Customer complaints about pricing |
| • International markets untapped | • Key engineer departures (LinkedIn) |
Positioning Map
A 2x2 matrix showing where competitors sit on two meaningful dimensions.
Choose Meaningful Axes
| Good Axes | Bad Axes |
|---|---|
| Simple ↔ Complex | Good ↔ Bad |
| SMB ↔ Enterprise | Cheap ↔ Expensive (too obvious) |
| Self-serve ↔ Sales-led | Old ↔ New |
| Specialized ↔ General | Small ↔ Large |
| Opinionated ↔ Flexible | — |
Template
Enterprise
│
Competitor C │ Competitor A
● │ ●
│
Simple ──────────────────────────── Complex
│
You ● │ Competitor B
│ ●
│
SMB
Generating the Visual
# Create positioning map with Python
infsh app run infsh/python-executor --input '{
"code": "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\nimport matplotlib\nmatplotlib.use(\"Agg\")\n\nfig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 10))\n\n# Competitors\ncompetitors = {\n \"You\": (-0.3, -0.3),\n \"Competitor A\": (0.5, 0.6),\n \"Competitor B\": (0.6, -0.4),\n \"Competitor C\": (-0.4, 0.5)\n}\n\nfor name, (x, y) in competitors.items():\n color = \"#22c55e\" if name == \"You\" else \"#6366f1\"\n size = 200 if name == \"You\" else 150\n ax.scatter(x, y, s=size, c=color, zorder=5)\n ax.annotate(name, (x, y), textcoords=\"offset points\", xytext=(10, 10), fontsize=12, fontweight=\"bold\")\n\nax.axhline(y=0, color=\"grey\", linewidth=0.5)\nax.axvline(x=0, color=\"grey\", linewidth=0.5)\nax.set_xlim(-1, 1)\nax.set_ylim(-1, 1)\nax.set_xlabel(\"Simple ← → Complex\", fontsize=14)\nax.set_ylabel(\"SMB ← → Enterprise\", fontsize=14)\nax.set_title(\"Competitive Positioning Map\", fontsize=16, fontweight=\"bold\")\nax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)\nplt.tight_layout()\nplt.savefig(\"positioning-map.png\", dpi=150)\nprint(\"Saved\")"
}'
Review Mining
Where to Find Reviews
| Platform | Best For | URL Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| G2 | B2B SaaS | g2.com/products/[product]/reviews |
| Capterra | Business software | capterra.com/software/[id]/reviews |
| App Store | iOS apps | apps.apple.com |
| Google Play | Android apps | play.google.com |
| Product Hunt | Launches | producthunt.com/posts/[product] |
| Honest opinions | reddit.com/r/[relevant-sub] |
What to Extract
| Category | Look For |
|---|---|
| Most praised | What features do happy users mention most? |
| Most complained | What do unhappy users say? (= your opportunity) |
| Switching reasons | Why do users leave? What triggers switching? |
| Feature requests | What's missing that users want? |
| Comparison mentions | When users compare, what do they say? |
# Mine G2 reviews
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
"query": "CompetitorX G2 reviews complaints issues 2024"
}'
# Reddit sentiment
infsh app run exa/search --input '{
"query": "reddit CompetitorX alternative frustration switching"
}'
Deliverable Formats
Executive Summary (1 page)
## Competitive Landscape Summary
**Market:** [Category] — $[X]B market growing [Y]% annually
**Key competitors:** A (leader), B (challenger), C (niche)
**Our positioning:** [Where you sit and why it matters]
**Key insight:** [One sentence about the biggest opportunity]
| Metric | You | A | B | C |
|--------|-----|---|---|---|
| Users | X | Y | Z | W |
| Pricing (starter) | $X | $Y | $Z | $W |
| Rating (G2) | X.X | Y.Y | Z.Z | W.W |
Detailed Report (per competitor)
- Company overview (size, funding, team)
- Product analysis (features, UX screenshots)
- Pricing breakdown
- SWOT analysis
- Review analysis (top praised, top complained)
- Positioning vs. you
- Opportunity summary
Comparison Grid Visual
# Stitch competitor screenshots into comparison
infsh app run infsh/stitch-images --input '{
"images": ["your-homepage.png", "competitorA-homepage.png", "competitorB-homepage.png"],
"direction": "horizontal"
}'
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Only looking at features | Misses positioning, pricing, traction | Use the 7-layer framework |
| Biased analysis | Loses credibility | Be honest about competitor strengths |
| Outdated data | Wrong conclusions | Date all research, refresh quarterly |
| Too many competitors | Analysis paralysis | Focus on top 3-5 direct competitors |
| No "so what" | Data without insight | End each section with implications for you |
| Feature-only comparison | Doesn't show positioning | Include pricing, reviews, positioning map |
Related Skills
npx skills add inference-sh/skills@web-search
npx skills add inference-sh/skills@prompt-engineering
Browse all apps: infsh app list
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
agent-ui
Batteries-included agent component for React/Next.js from ui.inference.sh. One component with runtime, tools, streaming, approvals, and widgets built in. Capabilities: drop-in agent, human-in-the-loop, client-side tools, form filling. Use for: building AI chat interfaces, agentic UIs, SaaS copilots, assistants. Triggers: agent component, agent ui, chat agent, shadcn agent, react agent, agentic ui, ai assistant ui, copilot ui, inference ui, human in the loop
chat-ui
Chat UI building blocks for React/Next.js from ui.inference.sh. Components: container, messages, input, typing indicators, avatars. Capabilities: chat interfaces, message lists, input handling, streaming. Use for: building custom chat UIs, messaging interfaces, AI assistants. Triggers: chat ui, chat component, message list, chat input, shadcn chat, react chat, chat interface, messaging ui, conversation ui, chat building blocks
tools-ui
Tool lifecycle UI components for React/Next.js from ui.inference.sh. Display tool calls: pending, progress, approval required, results. Capabilities: tool status, progress indicators, approval flows, results display. Use for: showing agent tool calls, human-in-the-loop approvals, tool output. Triggers: tool ui, tool calls, tool status, tool approval, tool results, agent tools, mcp tools ui, function calling ui, tool lifecycle, tool pending
widgets-ui
Declarative UI widgets from JSON for React/Next.js from ui.inference.sh. Render rich interactive UIs from structured agent responses. Capabilities: forms, buttons, cards, layouts, inputs, selects, checkboxes. Use for: agent-generated UIs, dynamic forms, data display, interactive cards. Triggers: widgets, declarative ui, json ui, widget renderer, agent widgets, dynamic ui, form widgets, card widgets, shadcn widgets, structured output ui
web-search
Web search and content extraction with Tavily and Exa via inference.sh CLI. Apps: Tavily Search, Tavily Extract, Exa Search, Exa Answer, Exa Extract. Capabilities: AI-powered search, content extraction, direct answers, research. Use for: research, RAG pipelines, fact-checking, content aggregation, agents. Triggers: web search, tavily, exa, search api, content extraction, research, internet search, ai search, search assistant, web scraping, rag, perplexity alternative
ai-rag-pipeline
Build RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) pipelines with web search and LLMs. Tools: Tavily Search, Exa Search, Exa Answer, Claude, GPT-4, Gemini via OpenRouter. Capabilities: research, fact-checking, grounded responses, knowledge retrieval. Use for: AI agents, research assistants, fact-checkers, knowledge bases. Triggers: rag, retrieval augmented generation, grounded ai, search and answer, research agent, fact checking, knowledge retrieval, ai research, search + llm, web grounded, perplexity alternative, ai with sources, citation, research pipeline
Didn't find tool you were looking for?