Agent skill
codex-orchestration
OpenAI Codex CLI + Claude Code (Hizir) birlikte kullanim rehberi. Is dagitim pattern'leri, GitHub Actions workflow ornekleri, review dongusu ve iki AI yazilim asistaninin guclu yanlarini birlestiren orchestration stratejileri.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/vibeeval/vibecosystem/tree/main/skills/codex-orchestration
SKILL.md
Codex + Claude Code Orchestration
Guc Dagilimi Matrisi
| Yetenek | Codex CLI | Claude Code (Hizir) | Kazanan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiz | Hizli (o4-mini) | Orta (opus) | Codex |
| Maliyet | Ucuz (~$1.10/1M input) | Pahalı (opus pricing) | Codex |
| Context window | Sinirli | 1M token | Claude Code |
| Multi-agent | YOK (tek agent) | 134+ agent swarm | Claude Code |
| Hook/self-learning | YOK | Tam destek (73 hook) | Claude Code |
| Memory/state | Stateless (her cagri bagimsiz) | Persistent memory | Claude Code |
| Code review | Basit lint | Derinlemesine + security | Claude Code |
| Bulk refactoring | Cok iyi (hiz+ucuz) | Iyi ama pahali | Codex |
| Mimari karar | Zayif | Guclu (architect agent) | Claude Code |
| Test yazma | Iyi | Iyi + TDD workflow | Esit |
| Security audit | Basit | 3-katman (SAST + review + manual) | Claude Code |
| CI/CD entegrasyonu | GitHub native | GitHub Actions + webhook | Esit |
Kullanim Senaryolari
Senaryo 1: Codex Implement, Claude Code Review
En yaygin ve etkili pattern.
1. Claude Code → plan.md olusturur (architect agent)
2. Codex → plan.md'ye gore implement eder (full-auto mode)
3. Codex → PR acar
4. Claude Code → PR review eder (code-reviewer + security-reviewer)
5. Codex → Review bulgularini fix eder
6. Claude Code → Final verify + merge onay
GitHub Actions Workflow:
# .github/workflows/codex-implement-claude-review.yml
name: Codex + Claude Code Pipeline
on:
issues:
types: [labeled]
jobs:
codex-implement:
if: contains(github.event.label.name, 'codex-task')
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Codex Implementation
env:
OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }}
run: |
npx codex --approval-mode full-auto \
--quiet \
-q "Implement the task described in issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }}. Follow the plan if provided."
- name: Create PR
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
git checkout -b codex/issue-${{ github.event.issue.number }}
git add -A
git commit -m "feat: implement issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }} [codex]"
git push -u origin codex/issue-${{ github.event.issue.number }}
gh pr create --title "Codex: Issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }}" \
--body "Automated implementation by Codex CLI. Awaiting Claude Code review."
claude-review:
needs: codex-implement
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Claude Code Review
env:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
run: |
# claude-review workflow zaten mevcut
claude -p "Review the PR changes. Run code-reviewer + security-reviewer. Report findings."
Senaryo 2: Dual Review (Codex Hizli + Claude Code Derin)
# .github/workflows/dual-review.yml
name: Dual AI Review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
jobs:
codex-quick-review:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Codex Quick Lint Review
run: |
npx codex --approval-mode full-auto -q \
"Review the diff for obvious issues: lint errors, typos, missing imports, type errors. Be brief."
claude-deep-review:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Claude Code Deep Review
run: |
claude -p "Deep review: architecture, security, performance, edge cases. Use code-reviewer + security-reviewer agents."
Senaryo 3: Codex Batch Task Dispatch
Birden fazla kuuk task'i Codex'e dagit, Claude Code koordine etsin.
#!/bin/bash
# batch-codex-tasks.sh
TASKS=(
"Add input validation to all API endpoints in src/api/"
"Convert all var declarations to const/let in src/utils/"
"Add JSDoc comments to all exported functions in src/lib/"
"Fix all TypeScript strict mode errors in src/models/"
)
for i in "${!TASKS[@]}"; do
echo "Task $((i+1)): ${TASKS[$i]}"
npx codex --approval-mode full-auto --quiet -q "${TASKS[$i]}" &
done
wait
echo "All Codex tasks complete. Running Claude Code verification..."
claude -p "Verify all changes: build, test, lint. Report issues."
Review Dongusu Pattern (5 Faz)
PHASE 1: PLAN (Claude Code)
├── architect agent ile plan olustur
├── Task'lari tanimla
├── Kabul kriterleri belirle
└── plan.md veya GitHub issue olustur
PHASE 2: IMPLEMENT (Codex)
├── codex --approval-mode full-auto
├── Her task icin ayri branch
├── PR ac
└── Codex kendi testlerini de yazabilir
PHASE 3: REVIEW (Claude Code)
├── code-reviewer: Kalite, pattern, best practice
├── security-reviewer: Guvenlik aciklari
├── verifier: Build + test + lint
└── VERDICT: PASS / FAIL + feedback
PHASE 4: FIX (Codex)
├── Claude Code'un feedback'ini al
├── Sadece belirtilen sorunlari duzelt
├── Yeni feature EKLEME
└── Tekrar PR guncelle
PHASE 5: MERGE (Claude Code)
├── Final verify
├── Tum testler geciyor mu?
├── Security temiz mi?
└── Merge onay + deploy
Codex CLI Kullanim Pattern'leri
Temel Komutlar
# Interaktif mod (terminal'de calisir)
codex
# Tek seferlik task (non-interactive)
codex -q "task aciklamasi"
# Full auto (onay istemeden yapar)
codex --approval-mode full-auto -q "task"
# Belirli model
codex --model o4-mini -q "task"
# Quiet mode (CI/CD icin)
codex --quiet -q "task"
CI/CD Entegrasyonu
# GitHub Actions icinde
CODEX_QUIET=1 npx codex --approval-mode full-auto -q "$TASK"
# Cikti kontrolu
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Codex task basarili"
else
echo "Codex task basarisiz, Claude Code'a devret"
claude -p "Fix the failed Codex task: $TASK"
fi
Maliyet Karsilastirmasi
| Senaryo | Sadece Claude Code | Sadece Codex | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 dosya refactoring | ~$2-5 | ~$0.30-0.50 | ~$0.80 |
| Security review | ~$1-3 (derinlemesine) | ~$0.20 (yuzeysel) | ~$1.20 |
| Test yazma (20 test) | ~$3-5 | ~$0.50-1.00 | ~$1.50 |
| Mimari planlama | ~$2-4 (detayli) | ~$0.30 (yuzeysel) | ~$2.30 |
| Toplam | ~$8-17 | ~$1.30-2.00 | ~$5.80 |
Hybrid strateji %40-60 maliyet tasarrufu saglar.
Formul: Codex'i "volume work" icin, Claude Code'u "judgment work" icin kullan.
Sinirlari ve Dikkat Edilecekler
Codex CLI Sinirlari
| Ozellik | Durum | Not |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent | YOK | Tek agent, swarm mumkun degil |
| Hook sistemi | YOK | PreToolUse/PostToolUse yok |
| Self-learning | YOK | Hatalardan ders cikarma yok |
| Persistent memory | YOK | Her cagri bagimsiz |
| Agent personas | YOK | Tek persona |
| Skill auto-discovery | KISMI | SKILL.md okuyabilir ama agent.md'leri kullanamaz |
| Context window | SINIRLI | 1M degil, daha kucuk |
| Tool calling | SINIRLI | Bash + file read/write |
Ne Zaman Codex KULLANMA
- Mimari kararlar gerektiren isler (Claude Code'un architect agent'i lazim)
- Security-critical degisiklikler (Claude Code'un 3-katman security review'i lazim)
- State gerektiren uzun isler (Codex stateless)
- Multi-file complex debug (Claude Code'un sleuth + coroner agent'lari lazim)
- Production deploy kararlari (Claude Code'un verify + ship workflow'u lazim)
Ne Zaman Codex KULLAN
- Bulk lint/format fix
- Boilerplate kod olusturma
- Basit test yazma
- Dokumantasyon olusturma/guncelleme
- Dependency upgrade (basit)
- Tekrarlayan refactoring (rename, extract method)
- i18n key ekleme
- Type annotation ekleme
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
python-testing
Python testing strategies using pytest, TDD methodology, fixtures, mocking, parametrization, and coverage requirements.
golang-patterns
Idiomatic Go patterns, best practices, and conventions for building robust, efficient, and maintainable Go applications.
tdd-migration-pipeline
Orchestrator-only workflow for migrating/rewriting codebases with full TDD and agent delegation
hizir
Hızır'ın kullanım kılavuzu. Tüm komutlar, agent'lar, workflow'lar, sistemler burada. /hizir yaz, her şeyi gör.
secret-patterns
30+ service-specific secret detection regex patterns, entropy-based detection, PEM/JWT/Base64 identification, and false positive filtering.
agentica-prompts
Write reliable prompts for Agentica/REPL agents that avoid LLM instruction ambiguity
Didn't find tool you were looking for?