Agent skill
check-coverage
Ensure comprehensive test coverage for a CLI handler. Use when adding a new command or auditing existing handler coverage.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/ldayton/Dippy/tree/main/.claude/skills/check-coverage
SKILL.md
Ensure the handler and tests for $ARGUMENTS provide comprehensive coverage.
1. Gather Documentation
Find documentation for the tool (need at least one source):
tldr:
ls ~/source/tldr/pages/*/$ARGUMENTS*.md
cat ~/source/tldr/pages/*/$ARGUMENTS.md
Local CLI:
$ARGUMENTS --help
man $ARGUMENTS
Stop if neither source exists.
2. Explore Subcommands
For tools with subcommands, recursively explore:
$ARGUMENTS <subcommand> --help
$ARGUMENTS help <subcommand>
Build a mental model of:
- All subcommands and their actions
- Which operations are read-only (safe) vs mutate state (unsafe)
- Global flags that affect parsing
- Edge cases
3. Review Existing Tests
Read tests/cli/test_$ARGUMENTS.py and check for:
- Coverage of all subcommands
- Both safe and unsafe variants of each action
- Global flag handling
- Edge cases from the docs
4. Add Missing Tests
Add aspirational test cases for anything missing. Follow existing format:
TESTS = [
# --- Subcommand group ---
("$ARGUMENTS <subcommand> <safe-action>", True),
("$ARGUMENTS <subcommand> <unsafe-action>", False),
]
5. Iterate Until Tests Pass
just test
For each failure, determine if the test expectation is correct:
- If yes, update
src/dippy/cli/$ARGUMENTS.py - If no, fix the test
6. Verify
just check MUST pass before you're done.
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
release
Create a release PR with version bump and changelog
debug
Debug incorrect Dippy approval or block behavior
add-command
Add support for a new CLI command. Use when implementing a handler or adding to SIMPLE_SAFE.
verify-counts
Verify numerical claims in documentation are still accurate
release
Create a release PR with version bump and changelog
verify-counts
Verify numerical claims in documentation are still accurate
Didn't find tool you were looking for?