Agent skill

batch-complete

Complete or cancel multiple items at once — close out features, clean up old work, archive completed workstreams. Use when a user says "close out this feature", "complete everything under X", "cancel this workstream", "clean up old items", "bulk complete", "finish this feature", or "archive completed work".

Stars 177
Forks 18

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/tree/main/claude-plugins/task-orchestrator/skills/batch-complete

SKILL.md

batch-complete — Bulk Complete or Cancel Items

Close out a feature subtree, cancel an abandoned workstream, or clean up stale items in one operation. Handles gate checks, active-item warnings, and reports exactly what succeeded and what was skipped.


Step 1 — Identify Scope

Determine what to complete before calling anything else.

If $ARGUMENTS looks like a UUID (8-4-4-4-12 hex pattern), use it directly as the root item ID in Step 2.

If $ARGUMENTS is a text string (title fragment or keyword), search for it:

query_items(operation="search", query="$ARGUMENTS", limit=5)

If the search returns exactly one result, use that item ID. If multiple results match, present them via AskUserQuestion:

◆ Multiple items matched "$ARGUMENTS" — which did you mean?
  1. "Auth System Feature" (queue) — uuid-1
  2. "Auth Token Refresh" (work) — uuid-2

If $ARGUMENTS is empty, classify the request from conversation context:

  • Feature subtree: user mentions completing "everything under" a named item → search for that item, use rootId
  • Specific items: user lists names or IDs → collect each UUID, use itemIds
  • Cleanup: user wants to clear old/stale items → search by status or title fragment, collect UUIDs, use itemIds

If scope still cannot be determined, ask via AskUserQuestion: "Which item (or items) do you want to complete? Provide a root UUID, a title fragment, or a list of item IDs."


Step 2 — Preview Impact

Before executing, show the user what will happen. Call:

query_items(operation="overview", itemId="<rootId>")

Parse the child counts by role and present a preview table. Use the trigger chosen (or likely to be chosen) to set the action label — trigger="complete" shows "will be completed"; trigger="cancel" shows "will be cancelled":

◆ Impact Preview — "Auth System Feature"  [trigger: complete]
  ○ queue:    3 items (will be completed)
  ◉ work:     1 item  (active — will be force-completed)
  ◉ review:   1 item  (active — will be force-completed)
  ✓ terminal: 2 items (already done — will be skipped)
◆ Impact Preview — "Auth System Feature"  [trigger: cancel]
  ○ queue:    3 items (will be cancelled)
  ◉ work:     1 item  (active — will be force-cancelled)
  ◉ review:   1 item  (active — will be force-cancelled)
  ✓ terminal: 2 items (already done — will be skipped)

For itemIds path (no root item): call query_items(operation="get", id="<uuid>") on each item and build the same role-grouped preview table from the individual results. For large lists (10+ items), use query_items(operation="search") with filters instead of individual get calls.

If any items are in work or review, warn the user that active work will be force-completed (gate checks still apply). Use AskUserQuestion with three options:

◆ 2 items are currently active (work or review).
  How would you like to proceed?
  1. Proceed — complete everything including active items
  2. Cancel active items instead — use trigger="cancel" (bypasses gates)
  3. Abort — leave everything as-is

Wait for the user's choice before continuing. Record whether to use trigger="complete" or trigger="cancel".


Step 3 — Gate Check

Skip this step if trigger="cancel" was already chosen in Step 2 — cancel bypasses all gates, so gate checking is unnecessary.

For trigger="complete", gate previewing is best-effort. complete_tree performs the definitive gate check during execution and reports any failures in its response. A lightweight pre-check is still useful to surface issues before committing — call get_context on each child from Step 2's results rather than on the root item (the root itself is not completed by complete_tree, only its descendants are):

get_context(itemId="<child-uuid>")   ← repeat for each child listed in Step 2

If any child's gate status shows missing required notes, display them:

⊘ Gate Warnings (preview — definitive check runs at execution):
  "Implement login" — missing: implementation-notes (work, required)
  "Write tests" — missing: test-results (work, required)

Then offer three options via AskUserQuestion:

◆ Some items have unfilled required notes and will be skipped by the gate.
  What would you like to do?
  1. Fill notes first — use manage_notes(operation="upsert") to fill each item's required notes, then return here
  2. Use cancel trigger — bypasses all gates, marks items as "cancelled"
  3. Proceed anyway — gated items will be skipped, others will complete

Call get_context(itemId=...) to retrieve guidancePointer for items with missing notes. Use the guidance as authoring instructions before filling.

Wait for the user's choice. If they choose option 2, switch to trigger="cancel" for the execution step.

If complete_tree reports gate failures in Step 4, fill the missing notes and rerun complete_tree — items already in terminal are silently skipped on subsequent runs.


Step 4 — Execute

Call complete_tree with the chosen trigger:

Feature subtree (rootId):

complete_tree(rootId="<uuid>", trigger="complete")

Specific items (itemIds):

complete_tree(itemIds=["<uuid-1>", "<uuid-2>", "<uuid-3>"], trigger="complete")

Cancel variant (bypasses gates):

complete_tree(rootId="<uuid>", trigger="cancel")

Parse the response and present results:

✓ Batch Complete — "Auth System Feature"
  ✓ Design API schema — completed
  ✓ Set up database — completed
  ⊘ Implement login — skipped (gate: missing implementation-notes)
  ✓ Write unit tests — completed
  — Integration tests — skipped (dependency on "Implement login")

  Summary: 3/5 completed | 1 gate failure | 1 dependency skip

Use these symbols:

  • — applied: true (completed or cancelled)
  • — gate failure (gateErrors present)
  • — skipped due to dependency on a failed item

Step 5 — Cleanup (Optional)

If the user wants to delete the completed items after finishing (to fully archive a workstream), confirm via AskUserQuestion:

◆ Delete all items under "Auth System Feature" after completing?
  This cannot be undone.
  1. Yes, delete them
  2. No, keep them in terminal state

If confirmed, delete with:

manage_items(operation="delete", ids=["<root-uuid>"], recursive=true)

Report what was deleted:

✓ Deleted: "Auth System Feature" and all 5 descendants

Complete vs Cancel Reference

Aspect trigger="complete" trigger="cancel"
Gate enforcement All required notes across all phases must be filled None — bypasses all gates
Final role terminal terminal
statusLabel (not set) "cancelled"
Use when Work is genuinely done and notes are filled Abandoning, discarding, or force-closing
Skips items Yes — gate failures and dependency skips No gate skips; dependency order still respected

complete_tree Response Fields

Field Meaning
applied: true Item was transitioned to terminal
skipped: true Item was not transitioned (see skippedReason)
skippedReason "already terminal", "dependency gate failed", or "gate failed"
gateErrors Array of missing required note keys that blocked completion

Troubleshooting

Problem: Items are skipped due to gate failures

Cause: The item has required notes that have not been filled. Gate enforcement runs before each transition and blocks completion.

Solution: Fill each item's missing required notes with manage_notes(operation="upsert"), then rerun complete_tree. Alternatively, switch to trigger="cancel" to bypass all gates and force-close the items.


Problem: Items are skipped due to dependency ordering

Cause: An upstream item in the tree failed its gate check. Any item that depends on it (via BLOCKS edges) is automatically skipped in the same run.

Solution: Fix the upstream gate failure first (fill required notes), then run complete_tree again. Only the previously-failed items need to be processed — items already in terminal are skipped silently on subsequent runs.


Problem: rootId not found or complete_tree returns an error

Cause: The UUID provided does not match any existing item, or the item has already been deleted.

Solution: Verify the UUID with query_items(operation="get", id="<uuid>"). If not found, search by title fragment: query_items(operation="search", query="<title>"). Use the returned UUID.


FAQ: All items reported as skipped with "already terminal"

This is expected behavior, not an error. Items already in terminal role are intentionally skipped — they were completed or cancelled in a prior run. If the summary shows all items skipped with "already terminal", the workstream is already closed. No further action is needed.


Examples

Example 1: Close a Completed Feature

All items are ready; notes are filled; clean completion with no skips.

Step 2 preview shows:

◆ Impact Preview — "Payment Integration"
  ○ queue:    3 items (will be completed)
  ◉ work:     0 items
  ◉ review:   0 items
  ✓ terminal: 1 item  (already done — will be skipped)

No active items — no warning needed. Gate check shows all required notes filled. Proceed directly.

Step 4 execute:

complete_tree(rootId="pay-uuid", trigger="complete")

Result:

✓ Batch Complete — "Payment Integration"
  ✓ Design payment schema — completed
  ✓ Implement Stripe API — completed
  ✓ Write payment tests — completed
  ✓ Payment Integration — completed (cascade from last child)

  Summary: 4/4 completed | 0 gate failures | 0 dependency skips

Example 2: Cancel an Abandoned Workstream

The feature was scoped out. Force-cancel everything without filling notes.

User says: "Cancel the 'Legacy API Migration' feature — we're not doing it."

Step 2 preview shows active items in work. User is warned and chooses option 2 (cancel active items).

Step 3 gate check — user chooses option 2 (use cancel trigger) to avoid filling notes.

Step 4 execute:

complete_tree(rootId="legacy-uuid", trigger="cancel")

Result:

✓ Batch Cancel — "Legacy API Migration"
  — Audit legacy endpoints — cancelled
  — Map replacement routes — cancelled
  — Update client libraries — cancelled
  — Legacy API Migration — cancelled

  Summary: 4/4 cancelled | 0 gate failures | 0 dependency skips

No gates enforced. All items reach terminal with statusLabel="cancelled".


Example 3: Mixed Result with Gate Failures

Some items complete cleanly; others are missing required notes.

Step 4 execute:

complete_tree(rootId="auth-uuid", trigger="complete")

Result:

✓ Batch Complete — "Auth System"
  ✓ Design auth schema — completed
  ✓ Set up user table — completed
  ⊘ Implement login — skipped (gate: missing implementation-notes)
  — Write integration tests — skipped (dependency on "Implement login")
  ✓ Write unit tests — completed

  Summary: 3/5 completed | 1 gate failure | 1 dependency skip

Follow up: fill implementation-notes on "Implement login" with manage_notes(operation="upsert"), then rerun complete_tree. The two remaining items will be processed on the next run.

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

implement

End-to-end workflow for taking MCP work items from backlog to merged PR. Handles git branching, schema-driven planning, implementation, independent review, and PR creation. Composes spec-quality, review-quality, and schema-workflow skills into a single pipeline. Use when a user says "implement this", "work on this item", "fix these bugs", "pick up the next task", "create a PR for this", "go through the backlog", or references specific MCP item IDs for implementation.

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

review-quality

Review quality framework for the work-to-review transition gate. Guides verification of plan alignment, test quality, and code simplification before marking implementation complete. Referenced by schema guidance fields during review-phase note filling. Read this skill when filling review-checklist notes or when asked to review completed implementation work.

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

feature-implementation

Guide the full lifecycle of a feature-implementation tagged MCP item (the feature container) — from queue through review

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

spec-quality

Specification quality framework for planning. Defines the minimum bar for what a plan must address — alternatives, non-goals, blast radius, risk flags, and test strategy. Referenced by schema guidance fields during queue-phase note filling. Read this skill whenever filling requirements or design notes for any MCP work item.

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

session-retrospective

Analyze the current implementation run — evaluate schema effectiveness, delegation alignment, note quality, plan-to-execution fit. Captures cross-session trends and proposes improvements when patterns repeat. Use after implementation runs, or when user says 'retrospective', 'session review', 'what did we learn', 'analyze this run', 'how did that go', 'evaluate our process', 'wrap up', 'end of session review'. Also use when the output style's retrospective nudge fires after complete_tree.

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

prepare-release

End-to-end release automation — reads commits since last tag, infers semver bump, drafts changelog, creates release PR, merges it, waits for CI green, tags, and monitors the Docker build to completion.

177 18
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results