/============================================================================/ /* SKILL SKILL :: VERILINGUA x VERIX EDITION / /============================================================================*/

name: SKILL version: 1.0.0 description: | [assert|neutral] SKILL skill for quality workflows [ground:given] [conf:0.95] [state:confirmed] category: quality tags:

• general author: system cognitive_frame: primary: evidential goal_analysis: first_order: "Execute SKILL workflow" second_order: "Ensure quality and consistency" third_order: "Enable systematic quality processes"

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S0 META-IDENTITY / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

[define|neutral] SKILL := { name: "SKILL", category: "quality", version: "1.0.0", layer: L1 } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S1 COGNITIVE FRAME / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

[define|neutral] COGNITIVE_FRAME := { frame: "Evidential", source: "Turkish", force: "How do you know?" } [ground:cognitive-science] [conf:0.92] [state:confirmed]

Kanitsal Cerceve (Evidential Frame Activation)

Kaynak dogrulama modu etkin.

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S2 TRIGGER CONDITIONS / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

[define|neutral] TRIGGER_POSITIVE := { keywords: ["SKILL", "quality", "workflow"], context: "user needs SKILL capability" } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S3 CORE CONTENT / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

Audit Pipeline - Complete Code Quality Workflow

Kanitsal Cerceve (Evidential Frame Activation)

Kaynak dogrulama modu etkin.

Cognitive Frame Activation

Kanitsal Kalite Hatti (Evidential Quality Pipeline)

Her bulgu icin metrik kaniti gereklidir:

• Finding: [description of quality issue]
• Evidence: [metric: value at location]
• Standard: [threshold from reference]
• Impact: [quantified effect on quality score]
• Confidence: [0.0-1.0]

Every quality finding MUST include:

1. Metric evidence: Concrete measurement (complexity=13, coverage=60%, lines=72)
2. Location evidence: Exact file path and line number [file:line]
3. Standard reference: Documented threshold (NASA limit, WCAG level, OWASP category)
4. Impact quantification: Quality score delta, risk level, maintainability cost

Al-Tahlil al-Sarfi lil-Jawda (Morphological Quality Analysis)

Root Cause Decomposition - Every quality issue has layers:

DIMENSION: [Maintainability | Performance | Security | Reliability]
  SURFACE: [visible symptom in code]
    - Location: [file:line]
    - Metric: [measurement]
  ROOT: [underlying cause]
    - Pattern: [anti-pattern name]
    - Origin: [design decision, knowledge gap, time pressure]
  DERIVED: [contributing factors]
    - Technical debt
    - Missing tests
    - Unclear requirements
  REMEDIATION: [target the root cause]
    - Fix: [address root, not symptom]
    - Prevent: [process change to avoid recurrence]

Example Decomposition:

DIMENSION: Maintainability
  SURFACE: God Object with 26 methods
    - Location: src/UserService.js:1-450
    - Metric: methods=26 (threshold=15), lines=450 (threshold=250)
  ROOT: Single Responsibility Principle violation
    - Pattern: God Object anti-pattern
    - Origin: Feature additions without refactoring
  DERIVED:
    - Missing abstraction for authentication logic
    - Missing abstraction for data validation
    - Missing abstraction for error handling
  REMEDIATION:
    - Fix: Extract AuthService, ValidationService, ErrorHandler
    - Prevent: Code review gate at 15 methods, refactoring sprint every 3 months

Purpose

Execute a comprehensive 3-phase code quality audit that systematically transforms code from prototype to production-ready by eliminating theater, verifying functionality through sandbox testing with Codex iteration, and polishing style to meet professional standards.

The 3-Phase Pipeline

This orchestrator runs three audit skills in the optimal sequence:

Phase 1: Theater Detection Audit

Finds: Mock data, hardcoded responses, TODO markers, stub functions, placeholder code Goal: Identify all "fake" implementations that need to be completed Skill: theater-detection-audit

Phase 2: Functionality Audit (with Codex Sandbox)

Validates: Code actually works through execution testing Method: Sandbox testing + Codex iteration loop for fixes Skill: functionality-audit + codex-auto Goal: Verify and fix functionality using Codex's Full Auto mode for iterative debugging

Phase 3: Style & Quality Audit

Polishes: Code organization, naming, documentation, best practices Goal: Production-grade code quality and maintainability Skill: style-audit

Why This Order Matters

1. Theater First - No point testing or polishing fake code

• Identifies what's real vs. placeholder
• Provides roadmap for completion
• Ensures subsequent phases test actual functionality

2. Functionality Second - Must work before polishing

• Validates real implementations
• Uses Codex sandbox for safe iterative testing
• Fixes bugs before style improvements
• Ensures refactoring won't break working code

3. Style Last - Polish after functionality is verified

• Refactors with confidence (tests prove it works)
• Improves maintainability of working code
• Final production-ready state

Usage

Complete Pipeline (All 3 Phases)

/audit-pipeline

With Specific T

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S4 SUCCESS CRITERIA / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

[define|neutral] SUCCESS_CRITERIA := { primary: "Skill execution completes successfully", quality: "Output meets quality thresholds", verification: "Results validated against requirements" } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S5 MCP INTEGRATION / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

[define|neutral] MCP_INTEGRATION := { memory_mcp: "Store execution results and patterns", tools: ["mcp__memory-mcp__memory_store", "mcp__memory-mcp__vector_search"] } [ground:witnessed:mcp-config] [conf:0.95] [state:confirmed]

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S6 MEMORY NAMESPACE / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

[define|neutral] MEMORY_NAMESPACE := { pattern: "skills/quality/SKILL/{project}/{timestamp}", store: ["executions", "decisions", "patterns"], retrieve: ["similar_tasks", "proven_patterns"] } [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]

[define|neutral] MEMORY_TAGGING := { WHO: "SKILL-{session_id}", WHEN: "ISO8601_timestamp", PROJECT: "{project_name}", WHY: "skill-execution" } [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S7 SKILL COMPLETION VERIFICATION / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

[direct|emphatic] COMPLETION_CHECKLIST := { agent_spawning: "Spawn agents via Task()", registry_validation: "Use registry agents only", todowrite_called: "Track progress with TodoWrite", work_delegation: "Delegate to specialized agents" } [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S8 ABSOLUTE RULES / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

[direct|emphatic] RULE_NO_UNICODE := forall(output): NOT(unicode_outside_ascii) [ground:windows-compatibility] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]

[direct|emphatic] RULE_EVIDENCE := forall(claim): has(ground) AND has(confidence) [ground:verix-spec] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]

[direct|emphatic] RULE_REGISTRY := forall(agent): agent IN AGENT_REGISTRY [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* PROMISE / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

[commit|confident] SKILL_VERILINGUA_VERIX_COMPLIANT [ground:self-validation] [conf:0.99] [state:confirmed]