Agent skill
architecture-decision-record
Use this skill when documenting significant architectural decisions. Provides ADR templates following the Nygard format with sections for context, decision, consequences, and alternatives. Use when writing ADRs, recording decisions, or evaluating options.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit/tree/main/plugins/ork/skills/architecture-decision-record
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- category
- document-asset-creation
SKILL.md
Architecture Decision Records
Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) are lightweight documents that capture important architectural decisions along with their context and consequences. This skill provides templates, examples, and best practices for creating and maintaining ADRs in your projects.
Overview
- Making significant technology choices (databases, frameworks, cloud providers)
- Designing system architecture or major components
- Establishing patterns or conventions for the team
- Evaluating trade-offs between multiple approaches
- Documenting decisions that will impact future development
Why ADRs Matter
ADRs serve as architectural memory for your team:
- Context Preservation: Capture why decisions were made, not just what was decided
- Onboarding: Help new team members understand architectural rationale
- Prevent Revisiting: Avoid endless debates about settled decisions
- Track Evolution: See how architecture evolved over time
- Accountability: Clear ownership and decision timeline
ADR Format (Nygard Template)
Each ADR should follow this structure:
1. Title
Format: ADR-####: [Decision Title]
Example: ADR-0001: Adopt Microservices Architecture
2. Status
Current state of the decision:
- Proposed: Under consideration
- Accepted: Decision approved and being implemented
- Superseded: Replaced by a later decision (reference ADR number)
- Deprecated: No longer recommended but not yet replaced
- Rejected: Considered but not adopted (document why)
3. Context
What to include:
- Problem statement or opportunity
- Business/technical constraints
- Stakeholder requirements
- Current state of the system
- Forces at play (conflicting concerns)
4. Decision
What to include:
- The choice being made
- Key principles or patterns to follow
- What will change as a result
- Who is responsible for implementation
Be specific and actionable:
- ✅ "We will adopt microservices architecture using Node.js with Express"
- ❌ "We will consider using microservices"
5. Consequences
What to include:
- Positive outcomes (benefits)
- Negative outcomes (costs, risks, trade-offs)
- Neutral outcomes (things that change but aren't clearly better/worse)
6. Alternatives Considered
Document at least 2 alternatives:
For each alternative, explain:
- What it was
- Why it was considered
- Why it was not chosen
7. References (Optional)
Links to relevant resources:
- Meeting notes or discussion threads
- Related ADRs
- External research or articles
- Proof of concept implementations
ADR Lifecycle
Proposed → Accepted → [Implemented] → (Eventually) Superseded/Deprecated
↓
Rejected
Best Practices
1. Keep ADRs Immutable
Once accepted, don't edit ADRs. Create new ADRs that supersede old ones.
- ✅ Create ADR-0015 that supersedes ADR-0003
- ❌ Update ADR-0003 with new decisions
2. Write in Present Tense
ADRs are historical records written as if the decision is being made now.
- ✅ "We will adopt microservices"
- ❌ "We adopted microservices"
3. Focus on 'Why', Not 'How'
ADRs capture decisions, not implementation details.
- ✅ "We chose PostgreSQL for relational consistency"
- ❌ "Configure PostgreSQL with these specific settings..."
4. Review ADRs as Team
Get input from relevant stakeholders before accepting.
- Architects: Technical viability
- Developers: Implementation feasibility
- Product: Business alignment
- DevOps: Operational concerns
5. Number Sequentially
Use 4-digit zero-padded numbers: ADR-0001, ADR-0002, etc. Maintain a single sequence even with multiple projects.
6. Store in Git
Keep ADRs in version control alongside code:
- Location:
/docs/adr/or/architecture/decisions/ - Format: Markdown for easy reading
- Branch: Same branch as implementation
Quick Start Checklist
Option 1: Use Script-Enhanced Generator (Recommended)
- Run
/create-adr [number] [title]to generate ADR with auto-filled context - ADR number, date, and author are auto-populated
- Review and fill in decision details
- Set Status to "Proposed" and review with team
Option 2: Use Static Template
- Copy ADR template from
assets/adr-template.md - Assign next sequential number (check existing ADRs)
- Fill in Context: problem, constraints, requirements
- Document Decision: what, why, how, who
- List Consequences: positive, negative, neutral
- Describe at least 2 Alternatives: what, pros/cons, why not chosen
- Add References: discussions, research, related ADRs
- Set Status to "Proposed"
- Review with team
- Update Status to "Accepted" after approval
- Link ADR in implementation PR
- Update Status to "Implemented" after deployment
Available Scripts
-
scripts/create-adr.md- Dynamic ADR generator with auto-filled context- Auto-fills: ADR number, date, author, total ADRs count
- Usage:
/create-adr [number] [title] - Uses
$ARGUMENTSand!commandfor dynamic context
-
assets/adr-template.md- Static template for manual use
Rules Quick Reference
| Rule | Impact | What It Covers |
|---|---|---|
| interrogation-scalability | HIGH | Scale questions, data volume, growth projections |
| interrogation-reliability | HIGH | Data patterns, UX impact, coherence validation |
| interrogation-security | HIGH | Access control, tenant isolation, attack surface |
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
❌ Too Technical: "We'll use Kubernetes with these 50 YAML configs..." ✅ Right Level: "We'll use Kubernetes for container orchestration because..."
❌ Too Vague: "We'll use a better database" ✅ Specific: "We'll use PostgreSQL 15+ for transactional data because..."
❌ No Alternatives: Only documenting the chosen solution ✅ Comparative: Document why alternatives weren't chosen
❌ Missing Consequences: Only listing benefits ✅ Balanced: Honest about costs and trade-offs
❌ No Context: "We decided to use Redis" ✅ Contextual: "Given our 1M+ concurrent users and sub-50ms latency requirement..."
Related Skills
ork:api-design: Use when designing APIs referenced in ADRsork:database-patterns: Use when ADR involves database choices- security-checklist: Consult when ADR has security implications
Skill Version: 2.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-08 Maintained by: AI Agent Hub Team
Capability Details
adr-creation
Keywords: adr, architecture decision, decision record, document decision Solves:
- How do I document an architectural decision?
- Create an ADR
- Architecture decision template
adr-best-practices
Keywords: when to write adr, adr lifecycle, adr workflow, adr process, adr review, quantify impact Solves:
- When should I write an ADR?
- How do I manage ADR lifecycle?
- What's the ADR review process?
- How to quantify decision impact?
- ADR anti-patterns to avoid
- Link related ADRs
tradeoff-analysis
Keywords: tradeoff, pros cons, alternatives, comparison, evaluate options Solves:
- How do I analyze tradeoffs?
- Compare architectural options
- Document alternatives considered
consequences
Keywords: consequence, impact, risk, benefit, outcome Solves:
- What are the consequences of this decision?
- Document decision impact
- Risk and benefit analysis
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
expect
Diff-aware AI browser testing — analyzes git changes, generates targeted test plans, and executes them via agent-browser. Reads git diff to determine what changed, maps changes to affected pages via route map, generates a test plan scoped to the diff, and runs it with pass/fail reporting. Use when testing UI changes, verifying PRs before merge, running regression checks on changed components, or validating that recent code changes don't break the user-facing experience.
github-operations
GitHub CLI operations for issues, PRs, milestones, and Projects v2. Covers gh commands, REST API patterns, and automation scripts. Use when managing GitHub issues, PRs, milestones, or Projects with gh.
chain-patterns
Chain patterns for CC 2.1.71 pipelines — MCP detection, handoff files, checkpoint-resume, worktree agents, CronCreate monitoring. Use when building multi-phase pipeline skills. Loaded via skills: field by pipeline skills (fix-issue, implement, brainstorm, verify). Not user-invocable.
storybook-mcp-integration
Storybook MCP server integration for component-aware AI development. Covers 6 tools across 3 toolsets (dev, docs, testing): component discovery via list-all-documentation/get-documentation, story previews via preview-stories, and automated testing via run-story-tests. Use when generating components that should reuse existing Storybook components, running component tests via MCP, or previewing stories in chat.
component-search
Search 21st.dev component registry for production-ready React components. Finds components by natural language description, filters by framework and style system, returns ranked results with install instructions. Use when looking for UI components, finding alternatives to existing components, or sourcing design system building blocks.
ai-ui-generation
AI-assisted UI generation patterns for json-render, v0, Bolt, and Cursor workflows. Covers prompt engineering for component generation, review checklists for AI-generated code, design token injection, refactoring for design system conformance, and CI gates for quality assurance. Use when generating UI components with AI tools, rendering multi-surface MCP visual output, reviewing AI-generated code, or integrating AI output into design systems.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?